Orocué fire, March 2020 Orocué
The fire started on 4 March 2020 in Orocué, Colombia, and satellites saw it burning for 9 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 4,310 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 10th largest in Casanare since 2016 (of 65 with a page). Number 36 in Colombia in 2020, of 158.
Compare with…
Suggestions: Orocué · 2026Orocué · 2019Orocué · 2016Orocué · 2019
- Burnt area
- 4,310ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 9days
- 4 Mar 2020 – 12 Mar 2020
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 4 Mar
- 2020
- Heat detections
- 115
- in a single hotspot: 107 MW
- Danger at start
- 36
- High · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 266MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 9 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 3.6 mm on 13 Mar.
This area had burned before
18% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 776 ha in 2019.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Orocué where it started4,338 ha reached on 4 Mar0.9 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Inside the perimeter there were about 0.17 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
Official record
According to UNGRD, a fire of 4,100 ha was recorded in Orocue on 4 March 2020 (the satellite measured 4,310 ha). The record has no coordinates, so it was matched by municipality and date.
- Orocue 4 March 2020 4,100 ha
UNGRD (Unidad Nacional para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres), emergencias 2019-2022 en datos.gov.co (CC BY-SA 4.0). This is the agency’s operational record: its figures may be revised when the year’s statistics are closed.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Mar | 35.3 °C | 34 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 5 Mar | 35.2 °C | 31 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 6 Mar | 35.6 °C | 31 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 7 Mar | 36.5 °C | 31 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 8 Mar | 35.1 °C | 37 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 9 Mar | 32.5 °C | 45 % | 42 km/h | 0.8 mm | High 27 |
| 10 Mar | 33.6 °C | 36 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 11 Mar | 35.6 °C | 34 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 30 |
| 12 Mar | 34.6 °C | 39 % | 19 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 13 Mar after | 32.2 °C | 57 % | 33 km/h | 3.6 mm | Low 7 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 115Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 4,087 haOrocuéMarch 2026 · 5 days · 3 km away
- 2,932 haOrocuéFebruary 2019 · 5 days · 23 km away
- 2,561 haOrocué11 March 2016 · 4 days · 33 km away
- 2,952 haOrocuéJanuary 2019 · 6 days · 34 km away
- 2,305 haPuerto Gaitán4 March 2020 · 3 days · 37 km away
- 2,259 haPuerto Gaitán6 January 2022 · 2 days · 37 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Orocué fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 4 March 2020 to 12 March 2020 (9 days). The perimeter dates it from 4 March 2020 to 8 March 2020.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 4,310 hectares (43.1 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Orocué (4,338 ha, 0.9 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.5 °C, humidity dropped to 31 % and gusts hit 43 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 36, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Colombia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 123 · 119 · Emergency number and official warnings ›
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 4 March 2020 to 8 March 2020. 115 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- Compared with UNGRD: 4,100 official ha against 4,310 ha of perimeter; they agree within 25%.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.