Skip to content
worldfires
ER · Eritrea · –

Omhajer fire, 31 March 2020 Omhajer

Out · last detection 2 Apr 2020, 11:32 UTC

The fire started on 31 March 2020 in Omhajer, Eritrea, and satellites saw it burning for 3 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,209 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 4th largest in Gash-Barka since 2016 (of 35 with a page). Number 3 in Eritrea in 2020, of 13.

The power measured by the satellite is low (26.5 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
3,209ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
3days
31 Mar 2020 – 2 Apr 2020
Municipalities hit
1
subzones
Started on
31 Mar
2020
Heat detections
73
in a single hotspot: 26 MW
Danger at start
72
Very extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
185MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 31 Mar2 Apr
2 Apr 2020

How it evolved, day by day

31 Mar 2020 · 150 MW · 27 1 Apr 2020 · 365 MW · 42 2 Apr 2020 · 38 MW · 4
31 Mar 1 Apr 2 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

40°high
46km/h · peak gust
4%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2% of the area of London (32 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Omhajer where it started
    3,230 ha reached on 31 Mar
    0.6 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
31 Mar 38.8 °C 4 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 72
1 Apr 39.6 °C 7 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 74
2 Apr 38.8 °C 12 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 68
3 Apr after 38.4 °C 15 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 69
4 Apr after 37.5 °C 17 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
5 Apr after 38.2 °C 14 % 31 km/h 0.6 mm Extreme 52
6 Apr after 39.4 °C 12 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
7 Apr after 39.6 °C 10 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
8 Apr after 39.9 °C 9 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 60
9 Apr after 39.2 °C 12 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 60
10 Apr after 37.4 °C 16 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 61
11 Apr after 36.8 °C 14 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 63
12 Apr after 36.9 °C 11 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 66

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 72.1, a minimum humidity of 4% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 21.

FWI at the start 72.1
Minimum humidity 4 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Lalay Gash fire, February 2023
1,835 ha 3 days FWI 68.2 Min. humidity 3 % 82 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

3 days
median duration
1,865 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
—
rain at the end (median; 0 of 21 had it)

It was 1.7 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 3 days, against 3 days.

Only 3 of its 21 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
46km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 2 Apr, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. None of its 21 twins had rain when they ended.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 24 Mar 2020
After · 9 Apr 2020

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 73Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Eritrea

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Omhajer fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 31 March 2020 and 2 April 2020: 3 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,209 hectares (32.1 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Omhajer (3,230 ha, 0.6 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 39.6 °C, humidity dropped to 4 % and gusts hit 46 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 74, class Very extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Eritrea (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 21. Their median duration was 3 days and their median area 1,865 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 3 of its 21 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 73 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.