Skip to content
worldfires
GH · Ghana · –

North Gonja fire, 6 December 2021 North Gonja

Out · last detection 13 Dec 2021, 12:49 UTC

The fire started on 6 December 2021 in North Gonja, Ghana, and satellites saw it burning for 8 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,938 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 91th largest in Savannah since 2016 (of 242 with a page). Number 30 in Ghana in 2021, of 86.

Burnt area
2,938ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
8days
6 Dec 2021 – 13 Dec 2021
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
6 Dec
2021
Heat detections
78
in a single hotspot: 0 MW
Danger at start
34
High · FWI index
Average daily power
121MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 6 Dec13 Dec
13 Dec 2021

How it evolved, day by day

6 Dec 2021 · 146 MW · 19 7 Dec 2021 · 193 MW · 8 8 Dec 2021 · 335 MW · 28 9 Dec 2021 · 75 MW · 8 11 Dec 2021 · 37 MW · 5 12 Dec 2021 · 52 MW · 8 13 Dec 2021 · 10 MW · 2
6 Dec 8 Dec 11 Dec 13 Dec

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

36°high
33km/h · peak gust
16%lowest humidity

It had gone 23 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

52% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 235 ha in 2016, 761 ha in 2017, 607 ha in 2018.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.9% of the area of London (29 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. North Gonja where it started
    2,955 ha
    0.6 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
6 Dec 34.2 °C 22 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
7 Dec 36.0 °C 28 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
8 Dec 34.5 °C 26 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
9 Dec 33.4 °C 23 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
10 Dec 33.9 °C 16 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
11 Dec 34.6 °C 19 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
12 Dec 34.1 °C 21 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
13 Dec 35.0 °C 24 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
14 Dec after 34.5 °C 29 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
15 Dec after 34.4 °C 34 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
16 Dec after 34.2 °C 13 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
17 Dec after 32.8 °C 18 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
18 Dec after 32.9 °C 20 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
19 Dec after 32.6 °C 19 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
20 Dec after 30.8 °C 20 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
21 Dec after 32.8 °C 21 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
22 Dec after 32.9 °C 22 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
23 Dec after 32.9 °C 21 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 33.7, a minimum humidity of 22% and 23 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 69.

FWI at the start 33.7
Minimum humidity 22 %
Days without rain 23
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Sawla-Tuna-Kalba fire, December 2019
2,710 ha 9 days FWI 35.1 Min. humidity 22 % 28 km away, in 2019

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

9 days
median duration
2,031 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
4.7 mm
rain at the end (median; 2 of 69 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (2,938 ha against a median of 2,031 ha) and lasted 8 days, against 9 days.

In 67 of 69, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.7 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
33km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 13 Dec, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 2 of 69, with a median of 4.7 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 29 Nov 2021
After · 20 Dec 2021

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 0Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Ghana

Frequently asked questions

How long did the North Gonja fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 6 December 2021 and 13 December 2021: 8 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,938 hectares (29.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered North Gonja (2,955 ha, 0.6 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 36.0 °C, humidity dropped to 16 % and gusts hit 33 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 38, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Ghana (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 69. Their median duration was 9 days and their median area 2,031 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 67 of 69, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.7 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.