Skip to content
worldfires
ME · Montenegro · –

Nikšić Municipality fire, 27 August 2017 Nikšić Municipality

Out · last detection 6 Sept 2017, 11:48 UTC

The fire started on 27 August 2017 in Nikšić Municipality, Montenegro, and satellites saw it burning for 11 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 470 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality.

Number 29 in Montenegro in 2017, of 75.

Burnt area
470ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
11days
27 Aug 2017 – 6 Sept 2017
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
27 Aug
2017
Heat detections
115
in a single hotspot: 74 MW
Danger at start
43
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
116MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 27 Aug6 Sept
6 Sept 2017

How it evolved, day by day

27 Aug 2017 · 40 MW · 12 28 Aug 2017 · 14 MW · 6 29 Aug 2017 · 25 MW · 4 30 Aug 2017 · 190 MW · 12 31 Aug 2017 · 208 MW · 23 1 Sept 2017 · 405 MW · 39 2 Sept 2017 · 41 MW · 16 6 Sept 2017 · 6 MW · 3
27 Aug 29 Aug 1 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

31°high
62km/h · peak gust
10%lowest humidity

It had gone 5 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 5.7 mm on 8 Sept.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. Nikšić Municipality where it started
    471 ha reached on 27 Aug
    0.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Scrub and transitional woodland57 %
  • Mixed forest38 %
  • Broadleaved forest5.1 %
  • Other natural land0.6 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Very dry air: 3.1 % of the area in Montenegro

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
27 Aug 31.3 °C 10 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
28 Aug 27.8 °C 32 % 36 km/h 0.2 mm Very high 38
29 Aug 23.0 °C 41 % 53 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
30 Aug 28.2 °C 10 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
31 Aug 27.9 °C 18 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
1 Sept 28.6 °C 26 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
2 Sept 26.9 °C 34 % 62 km/h 6.2 mm Very high 47
3 Sept 15.2 °C 70 % 59 km/h 17.4 mm Very low 0
4 Sept 20.2 °C 29 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 1
5 Sept 20.1 °C 26 % 34 km/h 0.3 mm Low 9
6 Sept 22.7 °C 29 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
7 Sept after 22.9 °C 40 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
8 Sept after 19.5 °C 70 % 38 km/h 5.7 mm Very low 3

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 43.3, a minimum humidity of 10% and 5 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 31.

FWI at the start 43.3
Minimum humidity 10 %
Days without rain 5
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Kursumlija Municipality fire, July 2025
199 ha 6 days FWI 43.0 Min. humidity 12 % 182 km away, in 2025

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 10.7 mm on 9 Jul.

What happened to them

2 days
median duration
199 ha
median area
6 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.1 mm
rain at the end (median; 28 of 31 had it)

It was 2.4 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 11 days, against 2 days.

Only 7 of its 31 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 3 of 31, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.1 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

5.7 mmfirst rain
8 Sept2 days after it ended
62km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 6 Sept, and on 8 Sept 5.7 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 28 of 31, with a median of 3.1 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 20 Aug 2017
After · 13 Sept 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 115Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Montenegro

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Nikšić Municipality fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 27 August 2017 to 6 September 2017 (11 days). The perimeter dates it from 27 August 2017 to 30 August 2017.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 470 hectares (4.7 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Nikšić Municipality (471 ha, 0.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 31.3 °C, humidity dropped to 10 % and gusts hit 62 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 47, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Montenegro (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 31. Their median duration was 2 days and their median area 199 ha; 6 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 7 of its 31 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 3 of 31, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.1 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · 123 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 30 August 2017 → 6 September 2017.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112 · 123.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 27 August 2017 to 30 August 2017. 115 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM1 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.