Burned area
satellite only8,044ha
Union of 2 GWIS (Copernicus) perimeters: overlapping areas count once.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 5 Feb 2025 – 11 Feb 2025
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
CM · Cameroon · –
Ngambé-Tikar fire, 5 February 2025 Ngambé-Tikar
Out · last detection 12 Feb 2025, 12:54 UTC
The fire started on 5 February 2025 in Ngambé-Tikar, Cameroon, and satellites saw it burning for 7 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 8,044 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 13th largest in Centre since 2016 (of 178 with a page). Number 3 in Cameroon in 2025, of 158.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-27matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only7days
5 Feb 2025 to 11 Feb 2025: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 12 Feb 2025, 12:54 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only5 Feb 2025
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 5 Feb 2025
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
The worst day
satellite only2,861MW
Total radiative power on 10 February 2025; hotspots that day: 155.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 10 Feb 2025
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model41.8FWI · very high
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 60.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 5 Feb 2025, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model37.3°C · 12% RH
High of 37.3 °C and minimum humidity of 12% on 9 February 2025; gusts of 27 km/h on 9 February 2025.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 5 Feb 2025 – 11 Feb 2025
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
Living inside
model≈ 70people
Estimated residents inside the perimeter and 0.70 ha of built-up area (100 m grid, epoch 2025).
- Source
- GHSL R2023A · JRC
- Date
- calculated on 24 October 2026
+− cross-check
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
logLast day with fire: 18 February 2025 → 11 February 2025.
-
logStart date: 30 January 2025 → 5 February 2025.
-
logLast day with fire: 11 February 2025 → 18 February 2025.
-
logStart date: 5 February 2025 → 30 January 2025.
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
Area logged each night
Move the slider to see which area the page published each day.
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/ngambe-tikar-2025-02-2?v=2026-10-27A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire ngambe-tikar-2025-02-2.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-05 | 5 | 8 | 35.6 | 22.7 | 22 | 8 | 19.1 | 0 | 41.8 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2025-02-06 | 12 | 12 | 36.9 | 21.2 | 14 | 12 | 23 | 0 | 47 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2025-02-07 | 15 | 276 | 36.2 | 21.9 | 16 | 9.4 | 25.2 | 0 | 44.4 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2025-02-08 | 29 | 225 | 36.4 | 21 | 18 | 8.4 | 22 | 0 | 43.6 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2025-02-09 | 17 | 17 | 37.3 | 23.5 | 12 | 9.2 | 27 | 0 | 46 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2025-02-10 | 155 | 2,861 | 36.2 | 20.9 | 19 | 8.5 | 23.4 | 0 | 44.8 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2025-02-11 | 208 | 943 | 36.4 | 21.2 | 14 | 7.7 | 22.7 | 0 | 44.2 | muy_alto | 1 |
| 2025-02-12 | 94 | 479 | 36.2 | 20.8 | 14 | 8 | 25.2 | 0 | 44.7 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-02-13 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 21 | 14 | 6.9 | 20.5 | 0 | 43.8 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-02-14 | 0 | 0 | 35.8 | 20.7 | 16 | 9 | 20.5 | 0 | 46.2 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-02-15 | 0 | 0 | 35.9 | 21.6 | 15 | 7 | 23 | 0 | 44.3 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-02-16 | 0 | 0 | 36.2 | 21 | 8 | 8.5 | 24.1 | 0 | 48.2 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-02-17 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 20.7 | 14 | 8.8 | 21.2 | 0 | 48.8 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-02-18 | 0 | 0 | 36.9 | 21.3 | 15 | 12.5 | 24.1 | 0 | 53.2 | extremo | 0 |
| 2025-02-19 | 0 | 0 | 33.6 | 22.7 | 32 | 10.6 | 22.3 | 0 | 38.3 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-02-20 | 0 | 0 | 36.3 | 23.5 | 17 | 13.8 | 25.2 | 0 | 46 | muy_alto | 0 |
| 2025-02-21 | 0 | 0 | 35.4 | 20.7 | 20 | 15.5 | 29.2 | 0 | 48.1 | muy_alto | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 8,044ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 7days
- 5 Feb 2025 – 11 Feb 2025
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- communes
- Started on
- 5 Feb
- 2025
- Heat detections
- 535
- in a single hotspot: 0 MW
- Danger at start
- 42
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 603MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
5 Feb11 Feb
12 Feb 2025
How it evolved, day by day
5 Feb
7 Feb
10 Feb
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
37°high
27km/h · peak gust
12%lowest humidity
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
98% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 3,135 ha in 2017, 839 ha in 2019, 4,778 ha in 2020, 5,777 ha in 2021, 5,829 ha in 2022, 7,422 ha in 2023, 5,312 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 7,857 ha that had burned before.
- 7,391 ha Ngambé-Tikar fire, January 2023 35,334 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 5,829 ha Ngambé-Tikar fire, February 2022 10,811 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 5,777 ha Ngambé-Tikar fire, February 2021 20,565 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 5,312 ha Ngambé-Tikar fire, February 2024 11,174 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 4,626 ha Ngambé-Tikar fire, February 2020 6,441 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,088 ha Ngambé-Tikar fire, February 2017 4,443 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 877 ha Ngambé-Tikar fire, February 2017 1,200 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 839 ha Ngambé-Tikar fire, February 2019 1,125 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Ngambé-Tikar where it started8,100 ha1.2 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025Built-up area0.70 ha
Residents≈ 70
Inside the perimeter there were about 0.70 hectares of built-up land and about 70 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Started with 60 days without rain: 50 % of the area in Cameroon
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 Feb | 35.6 °C | 22 % | 19 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 6 Feb | 36.9 °C | 14 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 7 Feb | 36.2 °C | 16 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 8 Feb | 36.4 °C | 18 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 9 Feb | 37.3 °C | 12 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 10 Feb | 36.2 °C | 19 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 11 Feb | 36.4 °C | 14 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 12 Feb after | 36.2 °C | 14 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 13 Feb after | 36.0 °C | 14 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 14 Feb after | 35.8 °C | 16 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 15 Feb after | 35.9 °C | 15 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 16 Feb after | 36.2 °C | 8 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 17 Feb after | 36.0 °C | 14 % | 21 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 18 Feb after | 36.9 °C | 15 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 19 Feb after | 33.6 °C | 32 % | 22 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 20 Feb after | 36.3 °C | 17 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 21 Feb after | 35.4 °C | 20 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 41.8, a minimum humidity of 22% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 18.
FWI at the start
41.8
Minimum humidity
22 %
Days without rain
60+
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Ngambé-Tikar fire, 5 February 2025
8,044 ha
7 days
FWI 41.8
Min. humidity 22 %
Ngambé-Tikar fire, February 2024
2,577 ha
13 days
FWI 44.2
Min. humidity 22 %
17 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 6.5 mm on 2 Mar.
Massangam fire, February 2024
1,605 ha
12 days
FWI 42.9
Min. humidity 22 %
90 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 4.3 mm on 2 Mar.
Bankim fire, February 2024
2,131 ha
12 days
FWI 42.4
Min. humidity 21 %
55 km away, in 2024
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.9 mm on 2 Mar.
Ngambé-Tikar fire, February 2021
1,826 ha
20 days
FWI 41.7
Min. humidity 20 %
25 km away, in 2021
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 4.3 mm on 12 Mar.
Yoko fire, February 2019
1,444 ha
3 days
FWI 42.8
Min. humidity 22 %
133 km away, in 2019
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
- 12 days
- median duration
- 1,796 ha
- median area
- 100 %
- went past 1,000 ha
- 4.6 mm
- rain at the end (median; 10 of 18 had it)
It was 4.5 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 7 days, against 12 days.
None of its 18 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 8 of 18, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.6 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
—first rain
—no rain in ten days
27km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 11 Feb, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 10 of 18, with a median of 4.6 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 29 Jan 2025
After · 18 Feb 2025
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 13 February 2025 the air beside the fire reached 278 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 191: 13 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
PM2.5 peak278 µg/m³
Days over the guideline12 days
PM10394 µg/m³
Optical depth2.00
WHO 15
3 Feb6 Feb9 Feb12 Feb
Good
Fair
Moderate
Poor
Very poor
Extremely poor
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 0Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 27,810 haNgambé-Tikar9 February 2025 · 39 days · 3 km away
- 11,174 haNgambé-Tikar16 February 2024 · 23 days · 5 km away
- 35,334 haNgambé-TikarJanuary 2023 · 45 days · 12 km away
- 13,662 haNgambé-Tikar6 February 2017 · 35 days · 23 km away
- 11,440 haNgambé-Tikar3 February 2023 · 22 days · 27 km away
- 117,779 haNgambé-Tikar7 February 2026 · 45 days · 28 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Ngambé-Tikar fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 5 February 2025 and 11 February 2025: 7 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 8,044 hectares (80.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Ngambé-Tikar (8,100 ha, 1.2 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 37.3 °C, humidity dropped to 12 % and gusts hit 27 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 47, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Cameroon (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 18. Their median duration was 12 days and their median area 1,796 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. None of its 18 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 8 of 18, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.6 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page · 4 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
- Last day with fire: 18 February 2025 → 11 February 2025.
- Start date: 30 January 2025 → 5 February 2025.
- Last day with fire: 11 February 2025 → 18 February 2025.
- Start date: 5 February 2025 → 30 January 2025.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.