Skip to content
worldfires
CM · Cameroon · –

Ngambé-Tikar fire, 2 February 2024 Ngambé-Tikar

Out · last detection 27 Feb 2024, 12:34 UTC

The fire started on 2 February 2024 in Ngambé-Tikar, Cameroon, and satellites saw it burning for 25 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,669 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 83th largest in Centre since 2016 (of 178 with a page). Number 65 in Cameroon in 2024, of 195.

Burnt area
1,669ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
25days
2 Feb 2024 – 26 Feb 2024
Municipalities hit
1
communes
Started on
2 Feb
2024
Heat detections
110
in a single hotspot: 36 MW
Danger at start
40
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
54MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 2 Feb26 Feb
27 Feb 2024

How it evolved, day by day

4 Feb 2024 · 25 MW · 3 5 Feb 2024 · 57 MW · 6 6 Feb 2024 · 243 MW · 14 7 Feb 2024 · 18 MW · 2 8 Feb 2024 · 0 MW · 1 9 Feb 2024 · 11 MW · 4 10 Feb 2024 · 41 MW · 3 11 Feb 2024 · 99 MW · 8 12 Feb 2024 · 6 MW · 1 13 Feb 2024 · 28 MW · 3 15 Feb 2024 · 27 MW · 4 16 Feb 2024 · 46 MW · 5 17 Feb 2024 · 75 MW · 13 18 Feb 2024 · 52 MW · 3 19 Feb 2024 · 260 MW · 18 21 Feb 2024 · 36 MW · 4 23 Feb 2024 · 20 MW · 1 24 Feb 2024 · 46 MW · 4 25 Feb 2024 · 8 MW · 7 26 Feb 2024 · 13 MW · 3 27 Feb 2024 · 20 MW · 3
4 Feb 9 Feb 15 Feb 19 Feb 27 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

38°high
34km/h · peak gust
12%lowest humidity

It had gone 56 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.6 mm on 29 Feb.

This area had burned before

100% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,030 ha in 2016, 1,393 ha in 2017, 247 ha in 2019, 775 ha in 2020, 1,498 ha in 2021, 1,520 ha in 2022, 1,492 ha in 2023. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,679 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.1% of the area of London (17 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Ngambé-Tikar where it started
    1,680 ha reached on 4 Feb
    0.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
2 Feb 34.6 °C 19 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
3 Feb 34.9 °C 17 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
4 Feb 34.8 °C 19 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
5 Feb 35.3 °C 15 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
6 Feb 35.3 °C 12 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
7 Feb 35.8 °C 14 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
8 Feb 35.2 °C 18 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
9 Feb 34.1 °C 28 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
10 Feb 36.5 °C 17 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
11 Feb 37.1 °C 14 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
12 Feb 37.6 °C 15 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
13 Feb 38.3 °C 12 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
14 Feb 35.9 °C 20 % 17 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
15 Feb 35.2 °C 21 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
16 Feb 35.8 °C 16 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
17 Feb 35.0 °C 22 % 17 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
18 Feb 36.1 °C 15 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
19 Feb 35.4 °C 34 % 24 km/h 0.1 mm High 35
20 Feb 34.9 °C 36 % 23 km/h 0.7 mm High 33
21 Feb 35.7 °C 31 % 32 km/h 0.2 mm High 29
22 Feb 35.5 °C 18 % 34 km/h 1.5 mm High 33
23 Feb 35.0 °C 16 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
24 Feb 35.4 °C 21 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
25 Feb 36.9 °C 21 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
26 Feb 36.9 °C 27 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
27 Feb after 37.3 °C 27 % 25 km/h 0.1 mm Very high 39
28 Feb after 37.6 °C 27 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
29 Feb after 35.2 °C 36 % 38 km/h 2.6 mm High 29

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 40.1, a minimum humidity of 19% and 56 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 28.

FWI at the start 40.1
Minimum humidity 19 %
Days without rain 56
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Ngambé-Tikar fire, February 2023
9,006 ha 26 days FWI 40.2 Min. humidity 19 % 75 km away, in 2023

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 4.8 mm on 10 Mar.

What happened to them

20 days
median duration
1,844 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
4.8 mm
rain at the end (median; 16 of 28 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (1,669 ha against a median of 1,844 ha) and lasted 25 days, against 20 days.

In 12 of 28, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.8 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

2.6 mmfirst rain
29 Feb3 days after it ended
34km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 26 Feb, and on 29 Feb 2.6 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 16 of 28, with a median of 4.8 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 26 Jan 2024
After · 4 Mar 2024

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 22 February 2024 the air beside the fire reached 93 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 77: 5.1 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak93 µg/m³
Days over the guideline16 days
PM10209 µg/m³
Optical depth1.27
7 Feb11 Feb15 Feb19 Feb
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 110Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Cameroon

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Ngambé-Tikar fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 2 February 2024 to 26 February 2024 (25 days). The perimeter dates it from 9 February 2024 to 19 February 2024.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,669 hectares (16.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Ngambé-Tikar (1,680 ha, 0.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 38.3 °C, humidity dropped to 12 % and gusts hit 34 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 54, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Cameroon (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 28. Their median duration was 20 days and their median area 1,844 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 12 of 28, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 4.8 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 19 February 2024 → 26 February 2024.
  2. Start date: 9 February 2024 → 2 February 2024.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 9 February 2024 to 19 February 2024. 110 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.