Skip to content
worldfires
CM · Cameroon · –

Ngambé-Tikar fire, 5 February 2023 Ngambé-Tikar

Out · last detection 23 Feb 2023, 12:54 UTC

The fire started on 5 February 2023 in Ngambé-Tikar, Cameroon, and satellites saw it burning for 19 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,380 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 50th largest in Centre since 2016 (of 178 with a page). Number 55 in Cameroon in 2023, of 270.

Burnt area
2,380ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
19days
5 Feb 2023 – 23 Feb 2023
Municipalities hit
1
communes
Started on
5 Feb
2023
Heat detections
126
in a single hotspot: 63 MW
Danger at start
50
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
83MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 5 Feb23 Feb
23 Feb 2023

How it evolved, day by day

5 Feb 2023 · 1 MW · 2 8 Feb 2023 · 24 MW · 2 10 Feb 2023 · 24 MW · 3 12 Feb 2023 · 31 MW · 8 13 Feb 2023 · 22 MW · 5 14 Feb 2023 · 2 MW · 3 15 Feb 2023 · 18 MW · 6 16 Feb 2023 · 5 MW · 5 17 Feb 2023 · 7 MW · 7 18 Feb 2023 · 161 MW · 9 19 Feb 2023 · 495 MW · 23 20 Feb 2023 · 211 MW · 22 21 Feb 2023 · 179 MW · 21 22 Feb 2023 · 18 MW · 7 23 Feb 2023 · 43 MW · 3
5 Feb 12 Feb 15 Feb 19 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

37°high
33km/h · peak gust
8%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 3.4 mm on 4 Mar.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.5% of the area of London (24 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Ngambé-Tikar where it started
    2,396 ha reached on 5 Feb
    0.3 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area0.14 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.14 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Very dry air: 32 % of the area in Cameroon 60 days without rain: 50 % of the area in Cameroon

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
5 Feb 37.4 °C 8 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
6 Feb 35.3 °C 21 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
7 Feb 35.3 °C 13 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
8 Feb 36.2 °C 17 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
9 Feb 34.6 °C 21 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
10 Feb 36.6 °C 11 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
11 Feb 36.2 °C 11 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
12 Feb 37.1 °C 12 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
13 Feb 35.6 °C 13 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
14 Feb 35.3 °C 13 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
15 Feb 34.8 °C 15 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
16 Feb 33.5 °C 19 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
17 Feb 34.6 °C 14 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
18 Feb 34.9 °C 17 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
19 Feb 34.9 °C 19 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
20 Feb 35.2 °C 18 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
21 Feb 36.1 °C 18 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
22 Feb 35.4 °C 26 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
23 Feb 35.0 °C 22 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
24 Feb after 35.1 °C 27 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
25 Feb after 34.9 °C 26 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
26 Feb after 34.5 °C 27 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
27 Feb after 37.2 °C 14 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
28 Feb after 35.4 °C 22 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
1 Mar after 35.9 °C 23 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
2 Mar after 36.2 °C 26 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
3 Mar after 32.1 °C 45 % 31 km/h 0.6 mm High 29
4 Mar after 33.7 °C 42 % 32 km/h 3.4 mm Moderate 20

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 50.2, a minimum humidity of 8% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 18.

FWI at the start 50.2
Minimum humidity 8 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Ngambé-Tikar fire, February 2019
1,023 ha 12 days FWI 52.5 Min. humidity 9 % 32 km away, in 2019

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 8.9 mm on 25 Feb.

What happened to them

13 days
median duration
1,236 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
8.2 mm
rain at the end (median; 14 of 18 had it)

It was 1.9 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 19 days, against 13 days.

Only 5 of its 18 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 4 of 18, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 8.2 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

3.4 mmfirst rain
4 Mar9 days after it ended
33km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 23 Feb, and on 4 Mar 3.4 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 14 of 18, with a median of 8.2 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 29 Jan 2023
After · 2 Mar 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 21 February 2023 the air beside the fire reached 374 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 203: 14 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak374 µg/m³
Days over the guideline16 days
PM10533 µg/m³
Optical depth2.14
10 Feb14 Feb18 Feb22 Feb
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 126Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Cameroon

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Ngambé-Tikar fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 5 February 2023 to 23 February 2023 (19 days). The perimeter dates it from 12 February 2023 to 22 February 2023.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,380 hectares (23.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Ngambé-Tikar (2,396 ha, 0.3 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 37.4 °C, humidity dropped to 8 % and gusts hit 33 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 53, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Cameroon (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 18. Their median duration was 13 days and their median area 1,236 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 5 of its 18 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 4 of 18, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 8.2 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 22 February 2023 → 23 February 2023.
  2. Start date: 12 February 2023 → 5 February 2023.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 12 February 2023 to 22 February 2023. 126 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.