Napranum fire, 3 September 2018 Napranum, Aurukun, Cook
The fire started on 3 September 2018 in Napranum, Australia, and satellites saw it burning for 13 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,341 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 1593th largest in Queensland since 2016 (of 1737 with a page). Number 854 in Australia in 2018, of 923.
The power measured by the satellite is low (23.7 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
- Burnt area
- 5,341ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 13days
- 3 Sept 2018 – 15 Sept 2018
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- local government areas
- Started on
- 3 Sept
- 2018
- Heat detections
- 145
- in a single hotspot: 24 MW
- Danger at start
- 44
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 709MW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 25 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
75% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,447 ha in 2016, 2,985 ha in 2017. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 4,026 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
Napranum where it started4,225 ha reached on 3 Sept2.1 %
-
940 ha reached on 6 Sept0.1 %
-
205 ha reached on 5 Sept0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept | 35.1 °C | 26 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 4 Sept | 34.5 °C | 26 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 5 Sept | 34.0 °C | 26 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 6 Sept | 33.4 °C | 30 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 7 Sept | 33.4 °C | 31 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 8 Sept | 33.5 °C | 28 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 9 Sept | 34.0 °C | 28 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 10 Sept | 34.2 °C | 30 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 11 Sept | 31.5 °C | 43 % | 47 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 37 |
| 12 Sept | 31.7 °C | 41 % | 50 km/h | 0.2 mm | Very high 41 |
| 13 Sept | 33.3 °C | 32 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 14 Sept | 32.2 °C | 42 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 15 Sept | 32.8 °C | 39 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 16 Sept after | 34.7 °C | 31 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 17 Sept after | 35.9 °C | 19 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 18 Sept after | 33.6 °C | 25 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 50 |
| 19 Sept after | 34.2 °C | 24 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 20 Sept after | 35.3 °C | 21 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 21 Sept after | 33.5 °C | 32 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 22 Sept after | 33.4 °C | 31 % | 53 km/h | 0.2 mm | Very high 50 |
| 23 Sept after | 33.1 °C | 30 % | 52 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 24 Sept after | 32.4 °C | 30 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 25 Sept after | 33.3 °C | 25 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 145Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Napranum fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 3 September 2018 and 15 September 2018: 13 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,341 hectares (53.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Napranum (4,225 ha, 2.1 %); Aurukun (940 ha, 0.1 %); Cook (205 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 35.1 °C, humidity dropped to 26 % and gusts hit 50 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 46, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Australia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 000
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.