Mpika fire, 21 September 2023 Mpika, Shiwang'Andu
The fire started on 21 September 2023 in Mpika, Zambia, and satellites saw it burning for 19 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 8,366 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 122th largest in Muchinga since 2016 (of 517 with a page). Number 25 in Zambia in 2023, of 165.
Compare with…
- Burnt area
- 8,366ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 19days
- 21 Sept 2023 – 9 Oct 2023
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- districts
- Started on
- 21 Sept
- 2023
- Heat detections
- 415
- in a single hotspot: 86 MW
- Danger at start
- 41
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 273MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 22.7 mm on 17 Oct.
This area had burned before
100% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 4,914 ha in 2016, 5,302 ha in 2017, 3,987 ha in 2018, 1,367 ha in 2019, 4,114 ha in 2020, 1,228 ha in 2021, 3,207 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 8,342 ha that had burned before.
- 5,302 ha Mpika fire, October 2017 17,050 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 3,180 ha Mpika fire, September 2020 18,056 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,715 ha Shiwang'Andu fire, October 2016 5,821 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 694 ha Mpika fire, October 2016 3,313 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 596 ha Mpika fire, September 2018 9,089 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 128 ha Mpika fire, September 2018 8,955 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 81 ha Mpika fire, September 2016 5,187 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Mpika where it started6,929 ha reached on 18 Sept0.4 %
-
1,482 ha reached on 19 Sept0.2 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025Inside the perimeter there were about 4.2 hectares of built-up land and about 350 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21 Sept | 30.8 °C | 22 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 22 Sept | 29.9 °C | 30 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 23 Sept | 30.5 °C | 26 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 24 Sept | 30.9 °C | 28 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 25 Sept | 31.2 °C | 27 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 26 Sept | 32.1 °C | 26 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 27 Sept | 33.2 °C | 23 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 28 Sept | 31.0 °C | 33 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 29 Sept | 30.9 °C | 31 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 30 Sept | 31.9 °C | 27 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 1 Oct | 32.7 °C | 20 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 2 Oct | 31.7 °C | 24 % | 53 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 3 Oct | 26.6 °C | 41 % | 55 km/h | 0.5 mm | Very high 42 |
| 4 Oct | 28.4 °C | 37 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 5 Oct | 30.4 °C | 32 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 6 Oct | 31.4 °C | 31 % | 40 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 36 |
| 7 Oct | 32.6 °C | 27 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 8 Oct | 33.4 °C | 18 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 9 Oct | 33.2 °C | 22 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 10 Oct after | 32.7 °C | 26 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 11 Oct after | 32.2 °C | 28 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 12 Oct after | 33.6 °C | 25 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 13 Oct after | 34.9 °C | 22 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 14 Oct after | 35.7 °C | 21 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 15 Oct after | 34.1 °C | 21 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 16 Oct after | 33.9 °C | 26 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 17 Oct after | 29.2 °C | 44 % | 38 km/h | 22.7 mm | Low 6 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 30 September 2023 the air beside the fire reached 31 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 18: 1.2 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 415Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Mpika fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 21 September 2023 and 9 October 2023: 19 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 8,366 hectares (83.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Mpika (6,929 ha, 0.4 %); Shiwang'Andu (1,482 ha, 0.2 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 33.4 °C, humidity dropped to 18 % and gusts hit 55 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 51, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Zambia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 415 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.