Skip to content
worldfires
MZ · Mozambique · →

Mocuba fire, 22 August 2023 Mocuba

Out · last detection 27 Aug 2023, 11:38 UTC

The fire started on 22 August 2023 in Mocuba, Mozambique, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,854 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 552th largest in Zambézia since 2016 (of 841 with a page). Number 82 in Mozambique in 2023, of 128.

Compare with…
Burnt area
3,854ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
6days
22 Aug 2023 – 27 Aug 2023
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
22 Aug
2023
Heat detections
96
in a single hotspot: 60 MW
Danger at start
28
High · FWI index
Average daily power
190MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 22 Aug27 Aug
27 Aug 2023

How it evolved, day by day

22 Aug 2023 · 12 MW · 3 23 Aug 2023 · 308 MW · 19 24 Aug 2023 · 538 MW · 41 25 Aug 2023 · 91 MW · 14 26 Aug 2023 · 132 MW · 13 27 Aug 2023 · 60 MW · 6
22 Aug 23 Aug 24 Aug 25 Aug 26 Aug 27 Aug

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

35°high
48km/h · peak gust
20%lowest humidity

It had gone 11 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.7 mm on 28 Aug.

This area had burned before

77% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 53 ha in 2017, 440 ha in 2018, 874 ha in 2019, 153 ha in 2020, 1 ha in 2021, 2,566 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 2,955 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 2.4% of the area of London (39 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Mocuba where it started
    3,874 ha reached on 22 Aug
    0.4 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
22 Aug 33.2 °C 30 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
23 Aug 34.4 °C 22 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
24 Aug 33.8 °C 20 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
25 Aug 32.9 °C 27 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
26 Aug 34.7 °C 27 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
27 Aug 33.4 °C 29 % 48 km/h 0.8 mm Very high 38
28 Aug after 23.0 °C 62 % 49 km/h 2.7 mm Low 8

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 15 Aug 2023
After · 3 Sept 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 25 August 2023 the air beside the fire reached 41 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 21: 1.4 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak41 µg/m³
Days over the guideline1 day
PM1058 µg/m³
Optical depth0.72
2021222324252627282930
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 96Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Mozambique ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Mocuba fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 22 August 2023 and 27 August 2023: 6 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,854 hectares (38.5 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Mocuba (3,874 ha, 0.4 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 34.7 °C, humidity dropped to 20 % and gusts hit 48 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 39, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mozambique (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 96 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.