Skip to content
worldfires
JP · Japan ·

Minami Oguni fire, March 2018 南小国町 · Minami Oguni

Out · last detection 11 Mar 2018, 05:10 UTC

The fire started on 11 March 2018 in Minami Oguni, Japan, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 224 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 69th largest in Kumamoto since 2016 (of 75 with a page). Number 22 in Japan in 2018, of 23.

The power measured by the satellite is low (10.1 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Compare with…
Burnt area
224ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
1day
11 Mar 2018 – 11 Mar 2018
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
11 Mar
2018
Heat detections
4
in a single hotspot: 10 MW
Danger at start
0
Very low · FWI index
Average daily power
25MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 11 Mar11 Mar

How it evolved, day by day

11 Mar 2018 · 25 MW · 4

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

13°high
34km/h · peak gust
34%lowest humidity

It had gone one day without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 23.3 mm on 16 Mar.

This area had burned before

1% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2 ha in 2017.

What happened to each town

  1. Minami Oguni 南小国町 where it started
    224 ha reached on 11 Mar
    1.9 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area0.43 ha
Residents≈ 30

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.43 hectares of built-up land and about 30 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
11 Mar 12.9 °C 34 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 0
12 Mar after 13.9 °C 26 % 18 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 1
13 Mar after 16.9 °C 38 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 4
14 Mar after 19.2 °C 36 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 4
15 Mar after 18.1 °C 38 % 39 km/h 0.2 mm Low 6
16 Mar after 11.8 °C 79 % 43 km/h 23.3 mm Very low 0

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 0.4, a minimum humidity of 34% and 1 day without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 32.

FWI at the start 0.4
Minimum humidity 34 %
Days without rain 1
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Aso fire, February 2016
284 ha 1 day FWI 0.3 Min. humidity 34 % 22 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 3.5 mm on 29 Feb.

What happened to them

1 day
median duration
430 ha
median area
12 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.5 mm
rain at the end (median; 32 of 32 had it)

It stayed below its twins: 224 ha against a median of 430 ha. It lasted 1 day, against 1 day.

All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 3.5 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

23.3 mmfirst rain
16 Mar5 days after it ended
34km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 11 Mar, and on 16 Mar 23.3 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 32 of 32, with a median of 3.5 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 4 Mar 2018
After · 18 Mar 2018

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 4Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Japan

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Minami Oguni fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 11 March 2018 and 11 March 2018: 1 day between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 224 hectares (2.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Minami Oguni (224 ha, 1.9 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 12.9 °C, humidity dropped to 34 % and gusts hit 34 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 0, class Very low.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Japan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 32. Their median duration was 1 day and their median area 430 ha; 12 % went past 1,000 ha. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 3.5 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 119 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 119.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 4 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.