Skip to content
worldfires
ZM · Zambia · →

Milengi fire, 20 August 2016 Milengi, Mansa

Out · last detection 28 Aug 2016, 11:45 UTC

The fire started on 20 August 2016 in Milengi, Zambia, and satellites saw it burning for 8 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 6,944 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 188th largest in Luapula since 2016 (of 533 with a page). Number 63 in Zambia in 2016, of 246.

Compare with…
Burnt area
6,944ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
8days
20 Aug 2016 – 27 Aug 2016
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
20 Aug
2016
Heat detections
272
in a single hotspot: 52 MW
Danger at start
35
High · FWI index
Average daily power
260MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 20 Aug27 Aug
28 Aug 2016

How it evolved, day by day

20 Aug 2016 · 186 MW · 15 21 Aug 2016 · 200 MW · 26 22 Aug 2016 · 174 MW · 18 23 Aug 2016 · 568 MW · 55 24 Aug 2016 · 205 MW · 18 25 Aug 2016 · 323 MW · 21 26 Aug 2016 · 197 MW · 18 27 Aug 2016 · 177 MW · 26 28 Aug 2016 · 309 MW · 23
20 Aug 22 Aug 23 Aug 24 Aug 26 Aug 28 Aug

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

31°high
59km/h · peak gust
17%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 4.4% of the area of London (69 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Milengi where it started
    6,804 ha reached on 14 Aug
    1.1 %
  2. 174 ha reached on 18 Aug
    0.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area7.4 ha
Residents≈ 550

Inside the perimeter there were about 7.4 hectares of built-up land and about 550 residents (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
20 Aug 28.9 °C 30 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
21 Aug 30.1 °C 28 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
22 Aug 30.7 °C 28 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
23 Aug 30.2 °C 17 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
24 Aug 26.8 °C 30 % 59 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
25 Aug 26.3 °C 32 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
26 Aug 27.1 °C 31 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
27 Aug 27.1 °C 28 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
28 Aug after 26.7 °C 27 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
29 Aug after 26.7 °C 28 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
30 Aug after 27.1 °C 25 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
31 Aug after 27.6 °C 27 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
1 Sept after 26.8 °C 29 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
2 Sept after 26.9 °C 29 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
3 Sept after 27.7 °C 25 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
4 Sept after 28.7 °C 28 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
5 Sept after 29.3 °C 26 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
6 Sept after 29.5 °C 23 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 13 Aug 2016
After · 3 Sept 2016

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 272Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Zambia ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Milengi fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 20 August 2016 and 27 August 2016: 8 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 6,944 hectares (69.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Milengi (6,804 ha, 1.1 %); Mansa (174 ha, 0.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 30.7 °C, humidity dropped to 17 % and gusts hit 59 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 52, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Zambia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

No changes since 24 October 2026.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 272 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.