Skip to content
worldfires
CM · Cameroon · –

Meiganga fire, 1 February 2023 Meiganga, Garoua-Boulaï

Out · last detection 1 Mar 2023, 12:42 UTC

The fire started on 1 February 2023 in Meiganga, Cameroon, and satellites saw it burning for 29 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,750 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 2th largest in Adamaoua since 2016 (of 168 with a page). Number 15 in Cameroon in 2023, of 270.

Burnt area
5,750ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
29days
1 Feb 2023 – 1 Mar 2023
Municipalities hit
2
communes
Started on
1 Feb
2023
Heat detections
249
in a single hotspot: 180 MW
Danger at start
32
High · FWI index
Average daily power
209MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 1 Feb1 Mar
1 Mar 2023

How it evolved, day by day

1 Feb 2023 · 16 MW · 3 2 Feb 2023 · 51 MW · 3 3 Feb 2023 · 2 MW · 1 4 Feb 2023 · 34 MW · 2 5 Feb 2023 · 2 MW · 1 6 Feb 2023 · 520 MW · 16 7 Feb 2023 · 62 MW · 8 8 Feb 2023 · 57 MW · 6 9 Feb 2023 · 155 MW · 7 10 Feb 2023 · 99 MW · 5 12 Feb 2023 · 19 MW · 6 13 Feb 2023 · 1,742 MW · 32 14 Feb 2023 · 45 MW · 9 15 Feb 2023 · 1,242 MW · 31 16 Feb 2023 · 1 MW · 1 17 Feb 2023 · 68 MW · 8 18 Feb 2023 · 346 MW · 24 19 Feb 2023 · 230 MW · 14 20 Feb 2023 · 248 MW · 13 21 Feb 2023 · 75 MW · 8 22 Feb 2023 · 1 MW · 2 23 Feb 2023 · 48 MW · 4 24 Feb 2023 · 124 MW · 16 25 Feb 2023 · 349 MW · 12 26 Feb 2023 · 28 MW · 3 27 Feb 2023 · 1 MW · 2 28 Feb 2023 · 177 MW · 5 1 Mar 2023 · 124 MW · 7
1 Feb 7 Feb 13 Feb 20 Feb 26 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

35°high
42km/h · peak gust
10%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.8 mm on 10 Mar.

This area had burned before

67% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 413 ha in 2016, 442 ha in 2017, 848 ha in 2019, 2,106 ha in 2021, 1,797 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 3,869 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.6% of the area of London (58 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Meiganga where it started
    4,223 ha reached on 1 Feb
    0.6 %
  2. 1,035 ha reached on 3 Feb
    0.5 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area0.62 ha
Residents≈ 40

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.62 hectares of built-up land and about 40 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with 60 days without rain: 50 % of the area in Cameroon

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
1 Feb 32.1 °C 29 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
2 Feb 33.6 °C 17 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
3 Feb 33.1 °C 19 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
4 Feb 34.0 °C 16 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 68
5 Feb 35.0 °C 10 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 61
6 Feb 34.6 °C 14 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
7 Feb 34.1 °C 12 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
8 Feb 35.0 °C 12 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 60
9 Feb 34.2 °C 16 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
10 Feb 34.2 °C 14 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
11 Feb 34.6 °C 14 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 61
12 Feb 35.4 °C 13 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 73
13 Feb 34.3 °C 12 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 61
14 Feb 34.1 °C 14 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 64
15 Feb 33.5 °C 16 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 62
16 Feb 31.1 °C 16 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 64
17 Feb 32.8 °C 16 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 72
18 Feb 32.9 °C 13 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 74
19 Feb 33.3 °C 16 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 69
20 Feb 33.8 °C 15 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 60
21 Feb 34.9 °C 17 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 60
22 Feb 34.7 °C 16 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
23 Feb 33.8 °C 19 % 19 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
24 Feb 33.6 °C 22 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
25 Feb 32.9 °C 17 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
26 Feb 32.5 °C 28 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
27 Feb 34.2 °C 15 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
28 Feb 32.4 °C 23 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
1 Mar 33.0 °C 28 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
2 Mar after 34.3 °C 25 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
3 Mar after 31.9 °C 39 % 27 km/h 0.1 mm High 33
4 Mar after 33.2 °C 31 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
5 Mar after 35.2 °C 24 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
6 Mar after 35.7 °C 18 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
7 Mar after 35.6 °C 17 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
8 Mar after 34.4 °C 20 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
9 Mar after 32.3 °C 35 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
10 Mar after 30.0 °C 44 % 28 km/h 2.8 mm High 30

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 31.9, a minimum humidity of 29% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 16.

FWI at the start 31.9
Minimum humidity 29 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Meiganga fire, March 2024
1,829 ha 7 days FWI 29.4 Min. humidity 27 % 15 km away, in 2024

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.6 mm on 13 Mar.

What happened to them

15 days
median duration
1,514 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.3 mm
rain at the end (median; 5 of 16 had it)

It was 3.8 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 29 days, against 15 days.

None of its 16 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 11 of 16, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.3 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

2.8 mmfirst rain
10 Mar9 days after it ended
42km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 1 Mar, and on 10 Mar 2.8 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 5 of 16, with a median of 3.3 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 25 Jan 2023
After · 8 Mar 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 23 February 2023 the air beside the fire reached 150 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 87: 5.8 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak150 µg/m³
Days over the guideline22 days
PM10212 µg/m³
Optical depth0.94
4 Feb9 Feb14 Feb19 Feb24 Feb
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 249Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Cameroon

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Meiganga fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 1 February 2023 to 1 March 2023 (29 days). The perimeter dates it from 6 February 2023 to 22 February 2023.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,750 hectares (57.5 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Meiganga (4,223 ha, 0.6 %); Garoua-Boulaï (1,035 ha, 0.5 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 35.4 °C, humidity dropped to 10 % and gusts hit 42 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 74, class Very extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Cameroon (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 16. Their median duration was 15 days and their median area 1,514 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. None of its 16 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 11 of 16, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.3 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 22 February 2023 → 1 March 2023.
  2. Start date: 6 February 2023 → 1 February 2023.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 6 February 2023 to 22 February 2023. 249 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.