Meatu fire, July 2026 Meatu, Itilima
The fire started on 1 July 2026 in Meatu, Tanzania, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,894 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 24th largest in Simiyu since 2016 (of 68 with a page). Number 56 in Tanzania in 2026, of 200.
- Burnt area
- 5,894ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 4days
- 1 Jul 2026 – 4 Jul 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- districts
- Started on
- 1 Jul
- 2026
- Heat detections
- 69
- in a single hotspot: 105 MW
- Danger at start
- 36
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 893MW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 38 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
51% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2,414 ha in 2016, 125 ha in 2020, 147 ha in 2022, 453 ha in 2024, 1,020 ha in 2025. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 3,028 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
Meatu where it started3,980 ha reached on 1 Jul0.4 %
-
1,952 ha reached on 2 Jul0.4 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 Jul | 27.9 °C | 34 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 2 Jul | 26.9 °C | 35 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 3 Jul | 29.2 °C | 27 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 4 Jul | 29.3 °C | 31 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 5 Jul after | 27.1 °C | 39 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 6 Jul after | 27.9 °C | 33 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 7 Jul after | 28.1 °C | 31 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 8 Jul after | 28.0 °C | 31 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 9 Jul after | 29.0 °C | 32 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 10 Jul after | 29.0 °C | 34 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 11 Jul after | 27.3 °C | 39 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 12 Jul after | 27.4 °C | 42 % | 30 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 29 |
| 13 Jul after | 24.7 °C | 43 % | 30 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 30 |
| 14 Jul after | 27.7 °C | 35 % | 34 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 30 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 29 June 2026 the air beside the fire reached 24 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 69Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Meatu fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 1 July 2026 and 4 July 2026: 4 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,894 hectares (58.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Meatu (3,980 ha, 0.4 %); Itilima (1,952 ha, 0.4 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 29.3 °C, humidity dropped to 27 % and gusts hit 35 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 38, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Tanzania (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 112
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.