Skip to content
worldfires
MM · Myanmar · –

Mawkmai fire, 18 February 2024 Mawkmai, Shadaw, Langkho

Out · last detection 19 Mar 2024, 18:29 UTC

The fire started on 18 February 2024 in Mawkmai, Myanmar, and satellites saw it burning for 31 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 21,270 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.

It is the 7th largest in Shan since 2016 (of 625 with a page). Number 4 in Myanmar in 2024, of 174.

Compare with…
Burnt area
21,270ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
31days
18 Feb 2024 – 19 Mar 2024
Municipalities hit
3
municipalities
Started on
18 Feb
2024
Heat detections
1,137
in a single hotspot: 72 MW
Danger at start
42
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
126MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 18 Feb19 Mar
19 Mar 2024

How it evolved, day by day

18 Feb 2024 · 98 MW · 23 19 Feb 2024 · 61 MW · 26 20 Feb 2024 · 74 MW · 22 21 Feb 2024 · 56 MW · 12 22 Feb 2024 · 45 MW · 20 23 Feb 2024 · 62 MW · 10 24 Feb 2024 · 79 MW · 22 25 Feb 2024 · 92 MW · 28 26 Feb 2024 · 167 MW · 14 27 Feb 2024 · 209 MW · 40 28 Feb 2024 · 59 MW · 27 29 Feb 2024 · 217 MW · 57 1 Mar 2024 · 274 MW · 110 2 Mar 2024 · 240 MW · 69 3 Mar 2024 · 92 MW · 48 4 Mar 2024 · 111 MW · 44 5 Mar 2024 · 262 MW · 94 6 Mar 2024 · 219 MW · 81 7 Mar 2024 · 341 MW · 64 8 Mar 2024 · 31 MW · 12 9 Mar 2024 · 128 MW · 29 10 Mar 2024 · 59 MW · 21 11 Mar 2024 · 199 MW · 45 12 Mar 2024 · 165 MW · 62 13 Mar 2024 · 55 MW · 16 14 Mar 2024 · 67 MW · 19 15 Mar 2024 · 29 MW · 12 16 Mar 2024 · 189 MW · 31 17 Mar 2024 · 149 MW · 57 18 Mar 2024 · 26 MW · 7 19 Mar 2024 · 39 MW · 15
18 Feb 25 Feb 7 Mar 17 Mar

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

39°high
46km/h · peak gust
19%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.7 mm on 21 Mar.

This area had burned before

79% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 5,226 ha in 2016, 11,609 ha in 2017, 1,728 ha in 2018, 5,849 ha in 2019, 9,350 ha in 2020, 6,056 ha in 2021, 2,759 ha in 2022, 8,266 ha in 2023. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 16,757 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 13% of the area of London (213 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Mawkmai where it started
    11,961 ha reached on 18 Feb
    4.9 %
  2. 5,146 ha reached on 18 Feb
    2.4 %
  3. 4,252 ha reached on 18 Feb
    0.8 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with 60 days without rain: 24 % of the area in Myanmar

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
18 Feb 34.1 °C 23 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
19 Feb 33.9 °C 24 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
20 Feb 33.6 °C 25 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
21 Feb 34.0 °C 26 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
22 Feb 34.7 °C 26 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
23 Feb 34.6 °C 32 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
24 Feb 34.9 °C 25 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
25 Feb 36.7 °C 19 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
26 Feb 37.1 °C 20 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
27 Feb 37.8 °C 19 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
28 Feb 37.2 °C 22 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
29 Feb 36.9 °C 25 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
1 Mar 36.7 °C 23 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
2 Mar 37.0 °C 23 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
3 Mar 36.1 °C 32 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
4 Mar 37.4 °C 22 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
5 Mar 37.7 °C 25 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
6 Mar 37.6 °C 24 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
7 Mar 37.0 °C 27 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
8 Mar 37.2 °C 26 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
9 Mar 37.4 °C 26 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
10 Mar 37.3 °C 30 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
11 Mar 37.4 °C 25 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
12 Mar 36.4 °C 30 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
13 Mar 36.9 °C 25 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
14 Mar 36.5 °C 25 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
15 Mar 36.7 °C 25 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
16 Mar 37.2 °C 30 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
17 Mar 37.5 °C 28 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
18 Mar 38.6 °C 24 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
19 Mar 38.6 °C 24 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
20 Mar after 36.5 °C 31 % 28 km/h 0.1 mm Very high 42
21 Mar after 35.7 °C 31 % 30 km/h 1.7 mm High 32

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 42.0, a minimum humidity of 23% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 22.

FWI at the start 42.0
Minimum humidity 23 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Langkho fire, March 2019
2,889 ha 18 days FWI 43.5 Min. humidity 23 % 16 km away, in 2019

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

15 days
median duration
2,440 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
1.6 mm
rain at the end (median; 10 of 22 had it)

It was 8.7 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 31 days, against 15 days.

Only 1 of its 22 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 12 of 22, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.6 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

1.7 mmfirst rain
21 Mar2 days after it ended
46km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 19 Mar, and on 21 Mar 1.7 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 10 of 22, with a median of 1.6 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 11 Feb 2024
After · 26 Mar 2024

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 17 March 2024 the air beside the fire reached 63 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 41: 2.8 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak63 µg/m³
Days over the guideline30 days
PM1098 µg/m³
Optical depth1.25
21 Feb27 Feb4 Mar10 Mar16 Mar
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 1,137Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Myanmar

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Mawkmai fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 18 February 2024 to 19 March 2024 (31 days). The perimeter dates it from 23 February 2024 to 18 March 2024.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 21,270 hectares (212.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 3 municipalities: Mawkmai (11,961 ha, 4.9 %); Shadaw (5,146 ha, 2.4 %); Langkho (4,252 ha, 0.8 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 38.6 °C, humidity dropped to 19 % and gusts hit 46 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 51, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Myanmar (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 22. Their median duration was 15 days and their median area 2,440 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 1 of its 22 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 12 of 22, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 1.6 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 18 March 2024 → 19 March 2024.
  2. Start date: 23 February 2024 → 18 February 2024.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 3 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 23 February 2024 to 18 March 2024. 1,137 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.