Skip to content
worldfires
MZ · Mozambique · →

Malema fire, 7 September 2025 Malema

Out · last detection 30 Sept 2025, 10:56 UTC

The fire started on 7 September 2025 in Malema, Mozambique, and satellites saw it burning for 23 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 18,733 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 15th largest in Nampula since 2016 (of 392 with a page). Number 19 in Mozambique in 2025, of 313.

Compare with…
Burnt area
18,733ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
23days
7 Sept 2025 – 29 Sept 2025
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
7 Sept
2025
Heat detections
586
in a single hotspot: 0 MW
Danger at start
46
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
259MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 7 Sept29 Sept
30 Sept 2025

How it evolved, day by day

7 Sept 2025 · 95 MW · 10 8 Sept 2025 · 32 MW · 6 9 Sept 2025 · 1 MW · 2 10 Sept 2025 · 176 MW · 16 11 Sept 2025 · 160 MW · 19 12 Sept 2025 · 654 MW · 67 13 Sept 2025 · 296 MW · 24 14 Sept 2025 · 19 MW · 2 15 Sept 2025 · 28 MW · 4 16 Sept 2025 · 124 MW · 10 17 Sept 2025 · 114 MW · 17 18 Sept 2025 · 416 MW · 31 19 Sept 2025 · 207 MW · 32 20 Sept 2025 · 419 MW · 42 21 Sept 2025 · 742 MW · 53 22 Sept 2025 · 582 MW · 78 23 Sept 2025 · 195 MW · 38 24 Sept 2025 · 87 MW · 15 25 Sept 2025 · 1,248 MW · 70 26 Sept 2025 · 223 MW · 37 28 Sept 2025 · 18 MW · 3 29 Sept 2025 · 101 MW · 7 30 Sept 2025 · 21 MW · 3
7 Sept 11 Sept 15 Sept 19 Sept 23 Sept 25 Sept 28 Sept

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

33°high
50km/h · peak gust
20%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

76% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 6,789 ha in 2016, 2,601 ha in 2017, 1,272 ha in 2018, 3,983 ha in 2019, 3,239 ha in 2020, 3,290 ha in 2021, 407 ha in 2022, 1,530 ha in 2023, 2,615 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 14,311 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 12% of the area of London (187 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Malema where it started
    18,844 ha
    3.1 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area20 ha
Residents≈ 2,300

Inside the perimeter there were about 20 hectares of built-up land and about 2,300 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
7 Sept 29.6 °C 25 % 50 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
8 Sept 30.2 °C 26 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
9 Sept 30.6 °C 34 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
10 Sept 32.2 °C 25 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
11 Sept 30.7 °C 26 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
12 Sept 31.2 °C 25 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
13 Sept 30.6 °C 25 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
14 Sept 29.8 °C 31 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
15 Sept 28.3 °C 43 % 26 km/h 0.2 mm High 28
16 Sept 31.0 °C 31 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
17 Sept 32.6 °C 25 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
18 Sept 32.8 °C 28 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
19 Sept 31.9 °C 32 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
20 Sept 31.0 °C 26 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
21 Sept 31.6 °C 25 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
22 Sept 32.3 °C 26 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
23 Sept 32.0 °C 27 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
24 Sept 30.9 °C 29 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
25 Sept 32.6 °C 20 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
26 Sept 30.6 °C 27 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
27 Sept 29.1 °C 35 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
28 Sept 29.8 °C 33 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
29 Sept 33.1 °C 28 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
30 Sept after 31.4 °C 31 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
1 Oct after 28.0 °C 43 % 42 km/h 0.1 mm High 34
2 Oct after 29.0 °C 24 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
3 Oct after 29.6 °C 21 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
4 Oct after 27.8 °C 32 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
5 Oct after 28.1 °C 34 % 31 km/h 0.2 mm High 36
6 Oct after 29.9 °C 32 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
7 Oct after 29.8 °C 36 % 28 km/h 0.2 mm High 34
8 Oct after 30.4 °C 33 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
9 Oct after 32.1 °C 27 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 36

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 31 Aug 2025
After · 6 Oct 2025

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 5 September 2025 the air beside the fire reached 52 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 29: 1.9 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak52 µg/m³
Days over the guideline11 days
PM1053 µg/m³
Optical depth0.91
5678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293012
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 0Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Mozambique ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Malema fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 7 September 2025 and 29 September 2025: 23 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 18,733 hectares (187.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Malema (18,844 ha, 3.1 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 33.1 °C, humidity dropped to 20 % and gusts hit 50 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 47, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mozambique (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 4 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 6 October 2025 → 29 September 2025.
  2. Start date: 31 August 2025 → 7 September 2025.
  3. Last day with fire: 29 September 2025 → 6 October 2025.
  4. Start date: 7 September 2025 → 31 August 2025.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.