Skip to content
worldfires
TH · Thailand · →

Mae Chaem fire, 16 April 2016 แม่แจ่ม · Mae Chaem

Out · last detection 21 Apr 2016, 19:39 UTC

The fire started on 16 April 2016 in Mae Chaem, Thailand, and satellites saw it burning for 5 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,841 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 22th largest in Chiang Mai Province since 2016 (of 447 with a page). Number 20 in Thailand in 2016, of 486.

Burnt area
5,841ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
5days
16 Apr 2016 – 20 Apr 2016
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
16 Apr
2016
Heat detections
210
in a single hotspot: 46 MW
Danger at start
41
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
250MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

21 Apr 2016
HOTSPOTS BY DAY 16 Apr20 Apr

How it evolved, day by day

16 Apr 2016 · 1,261 MW · 122 17 Apr 2016 · 140 MW · 53 18 Apr 2016 · 38 MW · 14 19 Apr 2016 · 16 MW · 5 20 Apr 2016 · 26 MW · 6 21 Apr 2016 · 15 MW · 3
16 Apr 17 Apr 18 Apr 19 Apr 20 Apr 21 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

38°high
46km/h · peak gust
23%lowest humidity

It had gone 6 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.7 mm on 22 Apr.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. Mae Chaem แม่แจ่ม where it started
    5,881 ha reached on 16 Apr
    2.1 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
16 Apr 37.8 °C 23 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
17 Apr 37.8 °C 24 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
18 Apr 37.0 °C 30 % 40 km/h 0.2 mm Very high 40
19 Apr 37.5 °C 30 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
20 Apr 37.2 °C 30 % 46 km/h 0.1 mm Very high 43
21 Apr after 36.4 °C 29 % 47 km/h 0.5 mm Very high 44
22 Apr after 33.3 °C 39 % 55 km/h 1.7 mm High 22

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 9 Apr 2016
After · 27 Apr 2016

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 210Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Thailand ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Mae Chaem fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 16 April 2016 and 20 April 2016: 5 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,841 hectares (58.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Mae Chaem (5,881 ha, 2.1 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 37.8 °C, humidity dropped to 23 % and gusts hit 46 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 43, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Thailand (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 199 · 191

Satellite cross-check

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 199 · 191.

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.