Luena fire, 8 September 2025 Luena
The fire started on 8 September 2025 in Luena, Angola, and satellites saw it burning for 18 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,339 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 94th largest in Moxico since 2016 (of 108 with a page). Number 160 in Angola in 2025, of 191.
- Burnt area
- 5,339ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 18days
- 8 Sept 2025 – 25 Sept 2025
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- municipalities
- Started on
- 8 Sept
- 2025
- Heat detections
- 126
- in a single hotspot: 307 MW
- Danger at start
- 39
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 2.7GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.1 mm on 28 Sept.
This area had burned before
66% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 104 ha in 2019, 1,643 ha in 2020, 1,412 ha in 2022, 1,178 ha in 2023, 1,780 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 3,546 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
Luena where it started5,363 ha reached on 8 Sept0.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept | 30.9 °C | 25 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 9 Sept | 30.7 °C | 26 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 10 Sept | 31.2 °C | 21 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 11 Sept | 32.2 °C | 16 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 12 Sept | 28.9 °C | 31 % | 28 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 35 |
| 13 Sept | 28.8 °C | 33 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 14 Sept | 27.6 °C | 34 % | 29 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 32 |
| 15 Sept | 30.9 °C | 27 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 16 Sept | 31.7 °C | 23 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 17 Sept | 31.9 °C | 23 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 18 Sept | 32.7 °C | 23 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 36 |
| 19 Sept | 31.6 °C | 22 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 20 Sept | 31.5 °C | 24 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 21 Sept | 30.9 °C | 31 % | 26 km/h | 0.6 mm | High 30 |
| 22 Sept | 30.8 °C | 33 % | 24 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 30 |
| 23 Sept | 29.3 °C | 33 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 24 Sept | 33.4 °C | 22 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 25 Sept | 31.1 °C | 27 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 26 Sept after | 30.2 °C | 35 % | 33 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 35 |
| 27 Sept after | 31.8 °C | 27 % | 29 km/h | 0.4 mm | High 36 |
| 28 Sept after | 30.5 °C | 34 % | 34 km/h | 1.1 mm | High 25 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 12 September 2025 the air beside the fire reached 82 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 64: 4.3 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 126Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Luena fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 8 September 2025 and 25 September 2025: 18 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,339 hectares (53.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Luena (5,363 ha, 0.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 33.4 °C, humidity dropped to 16 % and gusts hit 39 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 43, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Angola (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.