Liúpo fire, August 2020 Liúpo
The fire started on 27 August 2020 in Liúpo, Mozambique, and satellites saw it burning for 7 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 3,282 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 327th largest in Nampula since 2016 (of 392 with a page). Number 160 in Mozambique in 2020, of 193.
- Burnt area
- 3,282ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 7days
- 27 Aug 2020 – 2 Sept 2020
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- districts
- Started on
- 27 Aug
- 2020
- Heat detections
- 97
- in a single hotspot: 41 MW
- Danger at start
- 23
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 816MW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 5 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.4 mm on 8 Sept.
This area had burned before
91% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,990 ha in 2016, 878 ha in 2017, 2,121 ha in 2018, 813 ha in 2019. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 3,001 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
Liúpo where it started3,300 ha reached on 24 Aug1.6 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug | 28.6 °C | 52 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 23 |
| 28 Aug | 29.3 °C | 51 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 23 |
| 29 Aug | 29.4 °C | 47 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 30 Aug | 30.4 °C | 38 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 31 Aug | 29.1 °C | 50 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 1 Sept | 28.1 °C | 51 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 2 Sept | 28.1 °C | 57 % | 45 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 28 |
| 3 Sept after | 27.0 °C | 53 % | 46 km/h | 0.9 mm | High 21 |
| 4 Sept after | 26.6 °C | 50 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 24 |
| 5 Sept after | 28.0 °C | 42 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 6 Sept after | 26.8 °C | 47 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 27 |
| 7 Sept after | 26.8 °C | 42 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 8 Sept after | 26.0 °C | 53 % | 38 km/h | 1.4 mm | Moderate 14 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 97Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 13,785 haLiúpo25 September 2018 · 5 days · 4 km away
- 18,931 haLiúpo3 October 2022 · 14 days · 6 km away
- 27,354 haLiúpoAugust 2026 · 31 days · 10 km away
- 16,681 haLiúpo8 September 2020 · 14 days · 11 km away
- 11,656 haLiúpo15 October 2017 · 13 days · 16 km away
- 9,701 haLiúpo 27 September 2026 · 27 days · 17 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Liúpo fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 27 August 2020 and 2 September 2020: 7 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 3,282 hectares (32.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Liúpo (3,300 ha, 1.6 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 30.4 °C, humidity dropped to 38 % and gusts hit 45 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 31, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mozambique (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.