Skip to content
worldfires
CO · Colombia · →

La Macarena fire, February 2025 La Macarena, Calamar

Out · last detection 17 Feb 2025, 18:04 UTC

The fire started on 12 February 2025 in La Macarena, Colombia, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,529 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 249th largest in Meta since 2016 (of 257 with a page). Number 42 in Colombia in 2025, of 45.

Compare with…
Burnt area
1,529ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
6days
12 Feb 2025 – 17 Feb 2025
Municipalities hit
2
municipalities
Started on
12 Feb
2025
Heat detections
68
in a single hotspot: 136 MW
Danger at start
7
Low · FWI index
Average daily power
515MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 12 Feb17 Feb
17 Feb 2025

How it evolved, day by day

12 Feb 2025 · 46 MW · 2 15 Feb 2025 · 865 MW · 15 16 Feb 2025 · 1,053 MW · 47 17 Feb 2025 · 96 MW · 4
12 Feb 15 Feb 16 Feb 17 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

33°high
44km/h · peak gust
42%lowest humidity

It had gone 5 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 5.2 mm on 18 Feb.

This area had burned before

47% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 720 ha in 2024.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1% of the area of London (15 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. La Macarena 36,781 inhabitants where it started
    872 ha reached on 12 Feb
    0.1 %
  2. Calamar 9,091 inhabitants
    668 ha reached on 15 Feb
    0.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
16 Feb 32.8 °C 42 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Low 7
17 Feb 33.2 °C 51 % 44 km/h 0.4 mm Low 7
18 Feb after 31.5 °C 63 % 34 km/h 5.2 mm Very low 0

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 5 Feb 2025
After · 24 Feb 2025

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 18 February 2025 the air beside the fire reached 299 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 169: 11 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak299 µg/m³
Days over the guideline7 days
PM10301 µg/m³
Optical depth1.60
14151617181920
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 68Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Colombia ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the La Macarena fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 12 February 2025 to 17 February 2025 (6 days). The perimeter dates it from 16 February 2025 to 17 February 2025.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,529 hectares (15.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: La Macarena (872 ha, 0.1 %); Calamar (668 ha, 0.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 33.2 °C, humidity dropped to 42 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 7, class Low.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Colombia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 123 · 119 · Emergency number and official warnings ›

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Start date: 16 February 2025 → 12 February 2025.

RSS Changes to this page

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 123 · 119.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 16 February 2025 to 17 February 2025. 68 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology ›

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.