Skip to content
worldfires
CR · Costa Rica · –

La Cruz fire, March 2019 La Cruz

Out · last detection 9 Apr 2019, 18:49 UTC

The fire started on 20 March 2019 in La Cruz, Costa Rica, and satellites saw it burning for 21 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,433 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 24th largest in Provincia Guanacaste since 2016 (of 88 with a page). Number 4 in Costa Rica in 2019, of 16.

The power measured by the satellite is low (27.6 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
2,433ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
21days
20 Mar 2019 – 9 Apr 2019
Municipalities hit
1
cantons
Started on
20 Mar
2019
Heat detections
170
in a single hotspot: 28 MW
Danger at start
22
High · FWI index
Average daily power
45MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 20 Mar9 Apr
9 Apr 2019

How it evolved, day by day

20 Mar 2019 · 6 MW · 2 21 Mar 2019 · 7 MW · 3 22 Mar 2019 · 54 MW · 11 23 Mar 2019 · 59 MW · 15 24 Mar 2019 · 33 MW · 9 25 Mar 2019 · 17 MW · 7 26 Mar 2019 · 3 MW · 2 27 Mar 2019 · 84 MW · 13 28 Mar 2019 · 232 MW · 30 29 Mar 2019 · 55 MW · 16 30 Mar 2019 · 13 MW · 5 31 Mar 2019 · 13 MW · 5 2 Apr 2019 · 29 MW · 6 3 Apr 2019 · 23 MW · 3 4 Apr 2019 · 19 MW · 5 5 Apr 2019 · 5 MW · 4 6 Apr 2019 · 1 MW · 1 7 Apr 2019 · 33 MW · 8 8 Apr 2019 · 157 MW · 16 9 Apr 2019 · 59 MW · 9
20 Mar 24 Mar 28 Mar 2 Apr 6 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

33°high
77km/h · peak gust
44%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.2 mm on 11 Apr.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.5% of the area of London (24 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. La Cruz where it started
    2,448 ha reached on 20 Mar
    1.7 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area1.1 ha
Residents≈ 150

Inside the perimeter there were about 1.1 hectares of built-up land and about 150 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Strong wind: 50 % of the area in Costa Rica 60 days without rain: 45 % of the area in Costa Rica

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
20 Mar 30.3 °C 60 % 58 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
21 Mar 30.5 °C 54 % 66 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
22 Mar 29.0 °C 58 % 74 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
23 Mar 30.1 °C 52 % 69 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
24 Mar 30.0 °C 53 % 69 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
25 Mar 29.4 °C 63 % 65 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
26 Mar 30.3 °C 54 % 71 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
27 Mar 29.9 °C 54 % 77 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
28 Mar 29.1 °C 58 % 74 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
29 Mar 29.9 °C 56 % 67 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
30 Mar 31.2 °C 49 % 57 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
31 Mar 32.4 °C 48 % 54 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
1 Apr 32.0 °C 44 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
2 Apr 31.1 °C 59 % 60 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
3 Apr 31.2 °C 52 % 71 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
4 Apr 30.6 °C 55 % 66 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
5 Apr 30.6 °C 50 % 56 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
6 Apr 31.4 °C 50 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
7 Apr 31.8 °C 54 % 51 km/h 0.1 mm High 25
8 Apr 32.4 °C 45 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
9 Apr 33.1 °C 45 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
10 Apr after 33.9 °C 40 % 25 km/h 0.1 mm High 22
11 Apr after 32.9 °C 51 % 25 km/h 2.2 mm Low 7

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 22.3, a minimum humidity of 60% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 7.

FWI at the start 22.3
Minimum humidity 60 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Tola (Municipio) fire, March 2017
1,127 ha 4 days FWI 22.7 Min. humidity 64 % 53 km away, in 2017

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.2 mm on 3 Apr.

What happened to them

Fires in the area that started in similar weather: 7. With fewer than 15 we give no figures: they would be more noise than signal.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

2.2 mmfirst rain
11 Apr2 days after it ended
77km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 9 Apr, and on 11 Apr 2.2 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 13 Mar 2019
After · 16 Apr 2019

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 170Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Costa Rica

Frequently asked questions

How long did the La Cruz fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 20 March 2019 and 9 April 2019: 21 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,433 hectares (24.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered La Cruz (2,448 ha, 1.7 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 33.1 °C, humidity dropped to 44 % and gusts hit 77 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 30, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Costa Rica (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 911.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 170 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.