Skip to content
worldfires
MX · Mexico · –

La Concordia fire, March 2023 La Concordia

Out · last detection 6 Apr 2023, 19:57 UTC

The fire started on 23 March 2023 in La Concordia, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 15 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 7,326 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 12th largest in Chiapas since 2016 (of 246 with a page). Number 21 in Mexico in 2023, of 285.

Burnt area
7,326ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
15days
23 Mar 2023 – 6 Apr 2023
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
23 Mar
2023
Heat detections
290
in a single hotspot: 50 MW
Danger at start
22
High · FWI index
Average daily power
136MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 23 Mar6 Apr
6 Apr 2023

How it evolved, day by day

23 Mar 2023 · 223 MW · 42 24 Mar 2023 · 313 MW · 35 25 Mar 2023 · 626 MW · 63 26 Mar 2023 · 98 MW · 36 27 Mar 2023 · 85 MW · 9 28 Mar 2023 · 99 MW · 9 29 Mar 2023 · 63 MW · 16 30 Mar 2023 · 35 MW · 9 31 Mar 2023 · 22 MW · 6 1 Apr 2023 · 24 MW · 2 2 Apr 2023 · 100 MW · 7 3 Apr 2023 · 66 MW · 6 4 Apr 2023 · 130 MW · 22 5 Apr 2023 · 109 MW · 23 6 Apr 2023 · 49 MW · 5
25 Mar 29 Mar 1 Apr 4 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

34°high
38km/h · peak gust
23%lowest humidity

It had gone 4 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

68% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2,943 ha in 2017, 4,205 ha in 2020, 752 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 4,998 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 4.6% of the area of London (73 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. La Concordia where it started
    7,372 ha reached on 23 Mar
    2.8 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area0.24 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.24 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
23 Mar 33.7 °C 33 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
24 Mar 31.9 °C 45 % 32 km/h 0.4 mm High 24
25 Mar 32.5 °C 39 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
26 Mar 31.4 °C 48 % 32 km/h 0.7 mm Moderate 18
27 Mar 31.6 °C 44 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
28 Mar 33.0 °C 38 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
29 Mar 33.7 °C 31 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
30 Mar 32.9 °C 26 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
31 Mar 33.8 °C 34 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
1 Apr 32.7 °C 40 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
2 Apr 33.8 °C 23 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
3 Apr 32.1 °C 47 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 27
4 Apr 31.6 °C 50 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
5 Apr 34.3 °C 39 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 25
6 Apr 32.4 °C 39 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
7 Apr after 33.5 °C 31 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
8 Apr after 33.7 °C 28 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
9 Apr after 32.9 °C 29 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
10 Apr after 32.6 °C 34 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
11 Apr after 33.2 °C 33 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
12 Apr after 30.9 °C 45 % 24 km/h 0.5 mm High 25
13 Apr after 31.1 °C 41 % 32 km/h 0.4 mm High 28
14 Apr after 33.7 °C 34 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
15 Apr after 33.6 °C 35 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
16 Apr after 34.1 °C 34 % 30 km/h 0.2 mm High 30

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 22.2, a minimum humidity of 33% and 4 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 17.

FWI at the start 22.2
Minimum humidity 33 %
Days without rain 4
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Zinacantán fire, March 2020
2,048 ha 10 days FWI 21.2 Min. humidity 33 % 67 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 26.3 mm on 31 Mar.

What happened to them

8 days
median duration
1,671 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
2.4 mm
rain at the end (median; 14 of 17 had it)

It was 4.4 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 15 days, against 8 days.

None of its 17 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 3 of 17, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.4 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
38km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 6 Apr, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 14 of 17, with a median of 2.4 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 16 Mar 2023
After · 13 Apr 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 26 March 2023 the air beside the fire reached 72 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 31: 2.1 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak72 µg/m³
Days over the guideline12 days
PM10103 µg/m³
Optical depth0.60
21 Mar25 Mar29 Mar2 Apr6 Apr
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 290Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Mexico

Frequently asked questions

How long did the La Concordia fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 23 March 2023 and 6 April 2023: 15 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 7,326 hectares (73.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered La Concordia (7,372 ha, 2.8 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 34.3 °C, humidity dropped to 23 % and gusts hit 38 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 28, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 17. Their median duration was 8 days and their median area 1,671 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. None of its 17 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 3 of 17, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.4 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 911.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 290 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.