Kuluncak fire, September 2016 Kuluncak, Kangal
The fire started on 13 September 2016 in Kuluncak, Türkiye, and satellites saw it burning for 2 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 839 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 2th largest in Malatya since 2016 (of 35 with a page). Number 41 in Türkiye in 2016, of 223.
The power measured by the satellite is low (12.2 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
- Burnt area
- 839ha
- Copernicus perimeter
- Duration
- 2days
- 13 Sept 2016 – 14 Sept 2016
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- districts
- Started on
- 13 Sept
- 2016
- Heat detections
- 32
- in a single hotspot: 12 MW
- Danger at start
- 41
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 77MW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 5.7 mm on 16 Sept.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
-
568 ha reached on 12 Sept0.8 %
-
Kangal 21,669 inhabitants · 30.3 km from the town273 ha reached on 13 Sept0.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
What burned
- Other natural land100 %
Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept | 26.0 °C | 16 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 13 Sept | 26.3 °C | 13 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 14 Sept | 22.9 °C | 33 % | 31 km/h | 4.0 mm | Low 6 |
| 15 Sept after | 21.4 °C | 30 % | 31 km/h | 0.2 mm | Moderate 16 |
| 16 Sept after | 17.7 °C | 33 % | 39 km/h | 5.7 mm | Very low 5 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 13 September 2016 the air beside the fire reached 18 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 32Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Kuluncak fire last?
- Copernicus dates it between 13 September 2016 and 14 September 2016: 2 days between the first and last image with fire.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 839 hectares (8.4 km²). Official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Kuluncak (568 ha, 0.8 %); Kangal (273 ha, 0.1 %).
- Did the fire reach a town?
- The closest fire to a town centre came within 10.8 km of Kuluncak. That is the distance to the perimeter or nearest hotspot; it does not mean it entered the houses.
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 26.3 °C, humidity dropped to 13 % and gusts hit 41 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 50, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Türkiye (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 112
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.