Skip to content
worldfires
LR · Liberia · –

Kolahun fire, 7 April 2025 Kolahun, Voinjama

Out · last detection 8 Apr 2025, 14:04 UTC

The fire started on 7 April 2025 in Kolahun, Liberia, and satellites saw it burning for 2 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,387 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 97th largest in Lofa since 2016 (of 202 with a page). Number 12 in Liberia in 2025, of 28.

Compare with…
Burnt area
1,387ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
2days
7 Apr 2025 – 8 Apr 2025
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
7 Apr
2025
Heat detections
38
in a single hotspot: 106 MW
Danger at start
3
Very low · FWI index
Average daily power
470MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 7 Apr8 Apr
8 Apr 2025

How it evolved, day by day

7 Apr 2025 · 179 MW · 8 8 Apr 2025 · 759 MW · 30
7 Apr 8 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

33°high
28km/h · peak gust
56%lowest humidity

It had gone 9 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.2 mm on 9 Apr.

This area had burned before

80% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 612 ha in 2018, 438 ha in 2023, 503 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,109 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.9% of the area of London (14 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Kolahun where it started
    1,096 ha reached on 7 Apr
    0.5 %
  2. 301 ha reached on 8 Apr
    0.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area0.86 ha
Residents≈ 250

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.86 hectares of built-up land and about 250 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
7 Apr 32.6 °C 57 % 28 km/h 2.4 mm Very low 3
8 Apr 32.5 °C 56 % 24 km/h 0.3 mm Low 7
9 Apr after 31.1 °C 58 % 24 km/h 2.2 mm Very low 3

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 2.6, a minimum humidity of 57% and 9 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 51.

FWI at the start 2.6
Minimum humidity 57 %
Days without rain 9
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Yawei fire, April 2025
1,104 ha 1 day FWI 2.0 Min. humidity 57 % 82 km away, in 2025

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 23.4 mm on 24 Apr.

What happened to them

5 days
median duration
1,495 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
4.9 mm
rain at the end (median; 51 of 51 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (1,387 ha against a median of 1,495 ha) and lasted 2 days, against 5 days.

All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 4.9 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

2.2 mmfirst rain
9 Aprthe day after it ended
28km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 8 Apr, and on 9 Apr 2.2 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 51 of 51, with a median of 4.9 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 31 Mar 2025
After · 15 Apr 2025

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 10 April 2025 the air beside the fire reached 113 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 72: 4.8 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak113 µg/m³
Days over the guideline7 days
PM10127 µg/m³
Optical depth1.04
5 Apr7 Apr9 Apr11 Apr
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 38Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Liberia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Kolahun fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 7 April 2025 and 8 April 2025: 2 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,387 hectares (13.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Kolahun (1,096 ha, 0.5 %); Voinjama (301 ha, 0.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 32.6 °C, humidity dropped to 56 % and gusts hit 28 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 7, class Low.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Liberia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 51. Their median duration was 5 days and their median area 1,495 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 4.9 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 38 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.