Skip to content
worldfires
RS · Serbia · –

Knjazevac Municipality fire, October 2019 Општина Књажевац · Knjazevac Municipality

Out · last detection 29 Oct 2019, 12:07 UTC

The fire started on 27 October 2019 in Knjazevac Municipality, Serbia, and satellites saw it burning for 3 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 207 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 3th largest in Zaječarski upravni okrug since 2016 (of 13 with a page). Number 19 in Serbia in 2019, of 38.

The power measured by the satellite is low (26.1 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
207ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
3days
27 Oct 2019 – 29 Oct 2019
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
27 Oct
2019
Heat detections
10
in a single hotspot: 26 MW
Danger at start
16
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
60MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 27 Oct29 Oct
29 Oct 2019

How it evolved, day by day

27 Oct 2019 · 15 MW · 2 29 Oct 2019 · 104 MW · 8
27 Oct 29 Oct

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

21°high
23km/h · peak gust
39%lowest humidity

It had gone 16 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 14.3 mm on 7 Nov.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. Knjazevac Municipality Општина Књажевац 25,341 inhabitants · 11.8 km from the centre where it started
    207 ha reached on 27 Oct
    0.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Scrub and transitional woodland43 %
  • Agricultural areas34 %
  • Other natural land22 %
  • Broadleaved forest0.9 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
27 Oct 20.9 °C 39 % 16 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
28 Oct 19.9 °C 42 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
29 Oct 18.1 °C 52 % 15 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 13
30 Oct after 10.9 °C 78 % 20 km/h 0.2 mm Low 10
31 Oct after 6.7 °C 89 % 25 km/h 0.8 mm Very low 5
1 Nov after 5.4 °C 82 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Low 6
2 Nov after 13.5 °C 64 % 32 km/h 0.1 mm Low 6
3 Nov after 18.2 °C 54 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 13
4 Nov after 19.6 °C 52 % 54 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 17
5 Nov after 20.5 °C 41 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
6 Nov after 18.8 °C 51 % 48 km/h 0.6 mm Moderate 20
7 Nov after 14.7 °C 87 % 38 km/h 14.3 mm Very low 0

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 16.3, a minimum humidity of 39% and 16 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 32.

FWI at the start 16.3
Minimum humidity 39 %
Days without rain 16
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Lăpușnicel fire, April 2019
273 ha 5 days FWI 15.2 Min. humidity 39 % 164 km away, in 2019

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 5.1 mm on 9 Apr.

What happened to them

3 days
median duration
186 ha
median area
0 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.6 mm
rain at the end (median; 27 of 32 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (207 ha against a median of 186 ha) and lasted 3 days, against 3 days.

In 5 of 32, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.6 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

14.3 mmfirst rain
7 Nov9 days after it ended
23km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 29 Oct, and on 7 Nov 14.3 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 27 of 32, with a median of 3.6 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 20 Oct 2019
After · 5 Nov 2019

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 30 October 2019 the air beside the fire reached 67 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 52: 3.5 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak67 µg/m³
Days over the guideline6 days
PM1081 µg/m³
25 Oct27 Oct29 Oct31 Oct
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 10Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Serbia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Knjazevac Municipality fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 27 October 2019 to 29 October 2019 (3 days). The perimeter dates it from 29 October 2019 to 29 October 2019.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 207 hectares (2.1 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Knjazevac Municipality (207 ha, 0.2 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Knjazevac Municipality and came within 11.8 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 20.9 °C, humidity dropped to 39 % and gusts hit 23 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 19, class Moderate.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Serbia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 32. Their median duration was 3 days and their median area 186 ha; 0 % went past 1,000 ha. In 5 of 32, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.6 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 193 · 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 193 · 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 29 October 2019 to 29 October 2019. 10 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.