Kimvula fire, 19 August 2025 Kimvula, Popokabaka
The fire started on 19 August 2025 in Kimvula, Congo - Kinshasa, and satellites saw it burning for 26 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,814 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 11th largest in Kongo-Central since 2016 (of 18 with a page). Number 93 in Congo - Kinshasa in 2025, of 118.
- Burnt area
- 5,814ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 26days
- 19 Aug 2025 – 13 Sept 2025
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- territories
- Started on
- 19 Aug
- 2025
- Heat detections
- 305
- in a single hotspot: 85 MW
- Danger at start
- 38
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 2.4GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.1 mm on 14 Sept.
This area had burned before
91% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 2,210 ha in 2017, 3,360 ha in 2018, 259 ha in 2019, 2,404 ha in 2020, 3,370 ha in 2021, 3,147 ha in 2022, 3,464 ha in 2023, 3,429 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 5,291 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
Kimvula where it started3,281 ha reached on 12 Aug0.8 %
-
2,572 ha reached on 17 Aug0.4 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 Aug | 33.2 °C | 30 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 20 Aug | 32.0 °C | 37 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 21 Aug | 30.8 °C | 38 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 22 Aug | 29.7 °C | 40 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 23 Aug | 30.6 °C | 37 % | 36 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 36 |
| 24 Aug | 30.8 °C | 38 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 25 Aug | 30.4 °C | 42 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 26 Aug | 33.6 °C | 35 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 27 Aug | 33.8 °C | 36 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 28 Aug | 32.4 °C | 39 % | 25 km/h | 1.0 mm | High 23 |
| 29 Aug | 34.1 °C | 33 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 30 Aug | 31.9 °C | 41 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 31 Aug | 29.2 °C | 47 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 1 Sept | 31.6 °C | 44 % | 26 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 28 |
| 2 Sept | 33.3 °C | 36 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 3 Sept | 32.3 °C | 35 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 4 Sept | 29.9 °C | 45 % | 29 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 29 |
| 5 Sept | 32.2 °C | 43 % | 25 km/h | 0.6 mm | High 25 |
| 6 Sept | 31.3 °C | 50 % | 32 km/h | 0.9 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 7 Sept | 32.0 °C | 43 % | 24 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 24 |
| 8 Sept | 33.1 °C | 43 % | 27 km/h | 0.9 mm | High 23 |
| 9 Sept | 30.0 °C | 46 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 25 |
| 10 Sept | 32.0 °C | 45 % | 27 km/h | 1.4 mm | Moderate 17 |
| 11 Sept | 31.0 °C | 50 % | 30 km/h | 3.3 mm | Low 8 |
| 12 Sept | 32.1 °C | 48 % | 23 km/h | 0.6 mm | Moderate 17 |
| 13 Sept | 31.3 °C | 49 % | 27 km/h | 1.3 mm | Moderate 14 |
| 14 Sept after | 32.5 °C | 40 % | 28 km/h | 1.1 mm | Moderate 18 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 11 September 2025 the air beside the fire reached 127 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 76: 5.1 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 305Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 5,279 haKimvulaAugust 2017 · 13 days · 8 km away
- 5,107 haPopokabakaAugust 2018 · 6 days · 14 km away
- 30,908 haKimvulaAugust 2026 · 23 days · 21 km away
- 5,945 haKimvula25 August 2025 · 20 days · 22 km away
- 5,779 haPopokabaka30 August 2026 · 9 days · 33 km away
- 12,310 haKimvulaJune 2026 · 8 days · 36 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Kimvula fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 19 August 2025 and 13 September 2025: 26 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,814 hectares (58.1 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Kimvula (3,281 ha, 0.8 %); Popokabaka (2,572 ha, 0.4 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 34.1 °C, humidity dropped to 30 % and gusts hit 37 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 38, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Congo - Kinshasa (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.