Burned area
satellite only279ha
Perimeter published by EFFIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- EFFIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- perimeter revised on 17 April 2025
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
UA · Ukraine · –
Kiliia fire, February 2025 Кілійський район · Kiliia
Out · last detection 28 Feb 2025, 11:23 UTC
The fire started on 28 February 2025 in Kiliia, Ukraine, and satellites saw it burning for 3 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 279 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality.
This record is fire in the reed beds of the Danube Delta, not a forest fire. Thousands of hectares of reed burn in the delta every year, mostly between January and April, and many of these burns are deliberate. That is why it is left out of the fire rankings.
The power measured by the satellite is low (8.2 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-24matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only3days
28 Feb 2025 to 2 Mar 2025: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- EFFIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- last detection: 28 Feb 2025, 11:23 UTC
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only28 Feb 2025
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- EFFIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 28 Feb 2025
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Hotspots
satellite only1
VIIRS detections at 375 m. Most intense hotspot: 8 MW.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (Suomi NPP)
- Date
- 28 Feb 2025 – 2 Mar 2025
+− cross-check
There is no official record to compare with. Each hotspot is a pixel detected in one satellite pass, not a separate fire.
The worst day
satellite only8MW
Total radiative power on 28 February 2025; hotspots that day: 1.
- Source
- NASA FIRMS · VIIRS (FRP)
- Date
- 28 Feb 2025
+− cross-check
Fire radiative power (FRP) measures the energy the fire gives off when the satellite passes. Added up by day, it compares intensity, not area.
Danger at the start
model5.3FWI · low
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 24.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 28 Feb 2025, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model6.5°C · 63% RH
High of 6.5 °C and minimum humidity of 63% on 28 February 2025; gusts of 37 km/h on 28 February 2025.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 28 Feb 2025 – 2 Mar 2025
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
· reconstructed perimeterEFFIS (Copernicus) revises the perimeter
What was saved on 24 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 279 ha
- Dates
- 28 Feb 2025 – 2 Mar 2025
- Name
- Kiliia
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/kiliia-2025-02?v=2026-10-24A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire kiliia-2025-02.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-02-28 | 1 | 8 | 6.5 | 0.8 | 63 | 20.3 | 36.7 | 0 | 5.3 | bajo | 1 |
| 2025-03-01 | 0 | 0 | 6.4 | 0.8 | 71 | 11.8 | 22.7 | 1.7 | 2.8 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2025-03-02 | 0 | 0 | 4.8 | 1.8 | 89 | 13.9 | 26.3 | 4.8 | 0 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2025-03-03 | 0 | 0 | 5.2 | 0.7 | 63 | 17.4 | 32 | 0.1 | 0.1 | muy_bajo | 0 |
| 2025-03-04 | 0 | 0 | 9.7 | 2.2 | 54 | 17.2 | 31 | 0 | 0.6 | muy_bajo | 0 |
| 2025-03-05 | 0 | 0 | 15.8 | 1.2 | 33 | 15.9 | 31 | 0 | 2.8 | muy_bajo | 0 |
| 2025-03-06 | 0 | 0 | 18.9 | 3 | 27 | 13 | 24.8 | 0 | 6.2 | bajo | 0 |
| 2025-03-07 | 0 | 0 | 18.4 | 2.6 | 32 | 10.1 | 14 | 0 | 4.7 | muy_bajo | 0 |
| 2025-03-08 | 0 | 0 | 16.8 | 0.2 | 34 | 8.7 | 16.6 | 0 | 4.9 | muy_bajo | 0 |
| 2025-03-09 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 2.7 | 48 | 12.2 | 28.8 | 0 | 7.3 | bajo | 0 |
| 2025-03-10 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 2.2 | 59 | 13.8 | 25.6 | 0 | 4.4 | muy_bajo | 0 |
| 2025-03-11 | 0 | 0 | 19.2 | 5.6 | 41 | 17.9 | 30.6 | 0 | 8.3 | bajo | 0 |
| 2025-03-12 | 0 | 0 | 19.2 | 11.5 | 54 | 17.9 | 29.2 | 0 | 7.5 | bajo | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: EFFIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
- Burnt area
- 279ha
- Copernicus perimeter
- Duration
- 3days
- 28 Feb 2025 – 2 Mar 2025
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- districts
- Started on
- 28 Feb
- 2025
- Heat detections
- 1
- in a single hotspot: 8 MW
- Danger at start
- 5
- Low · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 8MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
HOTSPOTS BY DAY
28 Feb2 Mar
How it evolved, day by day
28 Feb 2025 · 8 MW · 1
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
6°high
37km/h · peak gust
63%lowest humidity
It had gone 24 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
-
280 ha reached on 28 Feb0.2 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
What burned
- Other natural land93 %
- Agricultural areas7.1 %
Land cover inside the perimeter as reported by Copernicus EFFIS (outside the Corine Land Cover area).
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28 Feb | 6.5 °C | 63 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 5 |
| 1 Mar | 6.4 °C | 71 % | 23 km/h | 1.7 mm | Very low 3 |
| 2 Mar | 4.8 °C | 89 % | 26 km/h | 4.8 mm | Very low 0 |
| 3 Mar after | 5.2 °C | 63 % | 32 km/h | 0.1 mm | Very low 0 |
| 4 Mar after | 9.7 °C | 54 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very low 1 |
| 5 Mar after | 15.8 °C | 33 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very low 3 |
| 6 Mar after | 18.9 °C | 27 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 6 |
| 7 Mar after | 18.4 °C | 32 % | 14 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very low 5 |
| 8 Mar after | 16.8 °C | 34 % | 17 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very low 5 |
| 9 Mar after | 15.0 °C | 48 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 7 |
| 10 Mar after | 13.0 °C | 59 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very low 4 |
| 11 Mar after | 19.2 °C | 41 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 8 |
| 12 Mar after | 19.2 °C | 54 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 8 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 5.3, a minimum humidity of 63% and 24 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2019: 8.
FWI at the start
5.3
Minimum humidity
63 %
Days without rain
24
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Kiliia fire, February 2025
279 ha
3 days
FWI 5.3
Min. humidity 63 %
Reni fire, March 2023
204 ha
2 days
FWI 1.6
Min. humidity 61 %
71 km away, in 2023
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.6 mm on 10 Mar.
Isaccea fire, February 2022
228 ha
2 days
FWI 4.5
Min. humidity 59 %
80 km away, in 2022
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.5 mm on 20 Feb.
Holo Prystan fire, August 2022
2,154 ha
9 days
FWI 5.8
Min. humidity 61 %
229 km away, in 2022
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.0 mm on 12 Aug.
Holo Prystan fire, June 2026
172 ha
23 days
FWI 8.8
Min. humidity 67 %
223 km away, in 2026
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 7.6 mm on 8 Jul.
Blăgești fire, February 2022
111 ha
1 day
FWI 7.0
Min. humidity 54 %
134 km away, in 2022
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
What happened to them
Fires in the area that started in similar weather: 8. With fewer than 15 we give no figures: they would be more noise than signal.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
—first rain
—no rain in ten days
37km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 2 Mar, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2019.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 21 Feb 2025
After · 9 Mar 2025
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 26 February 2025 the air beside the fire reached 43 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 26: 1.8 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
PM2.5 peak43 µg/m³
Days over the guideline1 day
PM1044 µg/m³
Optical depth0.53
WHO 15
26 Feb28 Feb2 Mar4 Mar
Good
Fair
Moderate
Poor
Very poor
Extremely poor
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 1Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV
Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 6,700 haChilia Veche31 March 2022 · 4 days · 13 km away
- 3,412 haChilia Veche29 March 2025 · 1 day · 14 km away
- 6,252 haKiliia Кілійський район24 March 2022 · 9 days · 18 km away
- 5,149 haKiliia Кілійський район3 January 2026 · 1 day · 18 km away
- 3,327 haC.A. Rosetti21 January 2020 · 4 days · 23 km away
- 7,692 haSulina20 March 2022 · 9 days · 26 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Kiliia fire last?
- Copernicus dates it between 28 February 2025 and 2 March 2025: 3 days between the first and last image with fire.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 279 hectares (2.8 km²). Official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Kiliia (280 ha, 0.2 %).
- Did the fire reach a town?
- The fire started in Kiliia and came within 12.5 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 6.5 °C, humidity dropped to 63 % and gusts hit 37 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 5, class Low.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Ukraine (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 101 · 112 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. One Suomi-NPP VIIRS detection on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Probably a vegetation burn: not counted in the totals.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.