Skip to content
worldfires
TH · Thailand · –

Khun Yuam fire, 22 March 2016 ขุนยวม · Khun Yuam

Out · last detection 3 Apr 2016, 06:06 UTC

The fire started on 22 March 2016 in Khun Yuam, Thailand, and satellites saw it burning for 13 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,992 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 135th largest in Mae Hong Son Province since 2016 (of 361 with a page). Number 120 in Thailand in 2016, of 387.

The power measured by the satellite is low (12.0 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
1,992ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
13days
22 Mar 2016 – 3 Apr 2016
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
22 Mar
2016
Heat detections
69
in a single hotspot: 12 MW
Danger at start
32
High · FWI index
Average daily power
29MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 22 Mar3 Apr
3 Apr 2016

How it evolved, day by day

22 Mar 2016 · 8 MW · 5 23 Mar 2016 · 12 MW · 3 24 Mar 2016 · 9 MW · 2 25 Mar 2016 · 82 MW · 13 26 Mar 2016 · 169 MW · 29 27 Mar 2016 · 25 MW · 10 28 Mar 2016 · 1 MW · 1 31 Mar 2016 · 0 MW · 1 1 Apr 2016 · 12 MW · 3 2 Apr 2016 · 1 MW · 1 3 Apr 2016 · 1 MW · 1
22 Mar 26 Mar 2 Apr

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

38°high
42km/h · peak gust
23%lowest humidity

It had gone 23 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.3% of the area of London (20 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Khun Yuam ขุนยวม where it started
    2,004 ha reached on 22 Mar
    1.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area1.1 ha
Residents≈ 150

Inside the perimeter there were about 1.1 hectares of built-up land and about 150 residents (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
22 Mar 35.9 °C 32 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
23 Mar 36.2 °C 28 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
24 Mar 36.4 °C 30 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
25 Mar 37.3 °C 29 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
26 Mar 36.2 °C 27 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
27 Mar 36.2 °C 23 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
28 Mar 36.0 °C 28 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
29 Mar 35.4 °C 28 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
30 Mar 35.2 °C 29 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
31 Mar 37.9 °C 23 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
1 Apr 35.6 °C 23 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 39
2 Apr 34.9 °C 28 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
3 Apr 36.6 °C 27 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
4 Apr after 36.9 °C 26 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
5 Apr after 37.5 °C 25 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 42
6 Apr after 37.1 °C 33 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
7 Apr after 38.1 °C 24 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm High 36
8 Apr after 38.1 °C 30 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 38
9 Apr after 36.8 °C 39 % 43 km/h 0.5 mm High 38
10 Apr after 38.1 °C 33 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm High 35
11 Apr after 39.9 °C 27 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm High 38
12 Apr after 38.3 °C 27 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
13 Apr after 38.6 °C 23 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 31.8, a minimum humidity of 32% and 23 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 36.

FWI at the start 31.8
Minimum humidity 32 %
Days without rain 23
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Mae Sariang fire, March 2021
1,696 ha 12 days FWI 31.9 Min. humidity 33 % 74 km away, in 2021

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.1 mm on 23 Mar.

What happened to them

11 days
median duration
2,296 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.1 mm
rain at the end (median; 18 of 36 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (1,992 ha against a median of 2,296 ha) and lasted 13 days, against 11 days.

In 18 of 36, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.1 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
42km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 3 Apr, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 18 of 36, with a median of 3.1 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 15 Mar 2016
After · 10 Apr 2016

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 69Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Thailand

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Khun Yuam fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 22 March 2016 to 3 April 2016 (13 days). The perimeter dates it from 24 March 2016 to 27 March 2016.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,992 hectares (19.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Khun Yuam (2,004 ha, 1.2 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 37.9 °C, humidity dropped to 23 % and gusts hit 42 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 40, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Thailand (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 36. Their median duration was 11 days and their median area 2,296 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 18 of 36, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.1 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 199 · 191 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 27 March 2016 → 3 April 2016.
  2. Start date: 24 March 2016 → 22 March 2016.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 199 · 191.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 24 March 2016 to 27 March 2016. 69 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.