Skip to content
worldfires
AZ · Azerbaijan ·

Khojaly District fire, August 2023 Khojaly District, Agdam District

Out · last measured on 19 Aug 2023

The fire started on 19 August 2023 in Khojaly District, Azerbaijan, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 701 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 172th largest in Contiguous Azerbaijan since 2016 (of 278 with a page). Number 2 in Azerbaijan in 2023, of 4.

We have the GWIS perimeter for this fire, but the VIIRS sensors did not capture it in enough detail: no day-by-day evolution, but the split by municipality is there.

Burnt area
701ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
1day
19 Aug 2023 – 19 Aug 2023
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
19 Aug
2023
Danger at start
31
High · FWI index

Where it burned

The weather it burned in

31°high
34km/h · peak gust
34%lowest humidity

It had gone 31 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 12.9 mm on 25 Aug.

This area had burned before

4% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 25 ha in 2019.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.4% of the area of London (7 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Khojaly District where it started
    606 ha
    0.6 %
  2. 97 ha
    0.1 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area0.17 ha
Residents≈ 40

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.17 hectares of built-up land and about 40 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
19 Aug 30.7 °C 34 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
20 Aug after 30.5 °C 37 % 31 km/h 0.1 mm High 30
21 Aug after 32.0 °C 34 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
22 Aug after 32.6 °C 29 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm High 28
23 Aug after 34.6 °C 31 % 31 km/h 0.1 mm High 30
24 Aug after 32.6 °C 42 % 28 km/h 0.1 mm High 28
25 Aug after 24.9 °C 68 % 34 km/h 12.9 mm Very low 0

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 30.9, a minimum humidity of 34% and 31 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 38.

FWI at the start 30.9
Minimum humidity 34 %
Days without rain 31
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Jabrayil District fire, June 2019
3,073 ha 4 days FWI 30.3 Min. humidity 36 % 60 km away, in 2019

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 4.2 mm on 1 Jul.

What happened to them

3 days
median duration
866 ha
median area
34 %
went past 1,000 ha
3.1 mm
rain at the end (median; 20 of 38 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (701 ha against a median of 866 ha) and lasted 1 day, against 3 days.

In 18 of 38, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.1 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

12.9 mmfirst rain
25 Aug6 days after it ended
34km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 19 Aug, and on 25 Aug 12.9 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 20 of 38, with a median of 3.1 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 12 Aug 2023
After · 26 Aug 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 20 August 2023 the air beside the fire reached 14 µg/m³ of PM2.5, but no daily average passed the WHO guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak14 µg/m³
Days over the guideline0 days
PM1032 µg/m³
Optical depth0.31
17 Aug19 Aug21 Aug
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Other fires nearby

All fires in Azerbaijan

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Khojaly District fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 19 August 2023 and 19 August 2023: 1 day between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 701 hectares (7.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Khojaly District (606 ha, 0.6 %); Agdam District (97 ha, 0.1 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 30.7 °C, humidity dropped to 34 % and gusts hit 34 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 31, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Azerbaijan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 38. Their median duration was 3 days and their median area 866 ha; 34 % went past 1,000 ha. In 18 of 38, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.1 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.