Kasenga fire, August 2025 Kasenga
The fire started on 24 August 2025 in Kasenga, Congo - Kinshasa, and satellites saw it burning for 15 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 10,101 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 12th largest in Haut-Katanga since 2016 (of 94 with a page). Number 20 in Congo - Kinshasa in 2025, of 118.
- Burnt area
- 10,101ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 15days
- 24 Aug 2025 – 7 Sept 2025
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- territories
- Started on
- 24 Aug
- 2025
- Heat detections
- 498
- in a single hotspot: 167 MW
- Danger at start
- 42
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 4.4GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
91% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 4,705 ha in 2016, 2,222 ha in 2017, 1,978 ha in 2018, 4,815 ha in 2019, 4,236 ha in 2020, 2,368 ha in 2021, 5,044 ha in 2022, 1,081 ha in 2023, 42 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 9,239 ha that had burned before.
- 1,408 ha Kasenga fire, September 2019 8,932 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 584 ha Kasenga fire, October 2022 5,075 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 204 ha Kasenga fire, August 2022 10,117 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
What happened to each town
-
Kasenga where it started10,172 ha reached on 23 Aug0.4 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug | 26.5 °C | 20 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 24 Aug | 26.3 °C | 19 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 25 Aug | 28.5 °C | 25 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 26 Aug | 28.4 °C | 26 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 27 Aug | 27.4 °C | 17 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 28 Aug | 27.2 °C | 22 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 29 Aug | 28.1 °C | 16 % | 48 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 30 Aug | 26.8 °C | 17 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 31 Aug | 26.6 °C | 20 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 1 Sept | 26.7 °C | 18 % | 52 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 2 Sept | 26.5 °C | 20 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 3 Sept | 26.3 °C | 24 % | 51 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 4 Sept | 26.8 °C | 18 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 5 Sept | 27.5 °C | 17 % | 49 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 6 Sept | 28.2 °C | 20 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 7 Sept | 28.7 °C | 17 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 8 Sept after | 28.6 °C | 18 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 9 Sept after | 29.1 °C | 16 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 10 Sept after | 29.3 °C | 22 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 11 Sept after | 27.5 °C | 30 % | 42 km/h | 0.1 mm | Very high 39 |
| 12 Sept after | 28.2 °C | 25 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 13 Sept after | 28.6 °C | 21 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 14 Sept after | 28.7 °C | 24 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 15 Sept after | 29.1 °C | 18 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 16 Sept after | 29.7 °C | 15 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 17 Sept after | 30.7 °C | 15 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 18 Sept after | 30.4 °C | 15 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 19 Sept after | 28.6 °C | 26 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 20 Sept after | 29.9 °C | 22 % | 54 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 21 Sept after | 28.0 °C | 26 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 22 Sept after | 29.2 °C | 26 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 23 Sept after | 30.3 °C | 23 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 6 September 2025 the air beside the fire reached 86 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 54: 3.6 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 498Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Kasenga fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 24 August 2025 and 7 September 2025: 15 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 10,101 hectares (101.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Kasenga (10,172 ha, 0.4 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 29.3 °C, humidity dropped to 16 % and gusts hit 52 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 49, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Congo - Kinshasa (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.