Kasempa fire, 18 September 2018 Kasempa
The fire started on 18 September 2018 in Kasempa, Zambia, and satellites saw it burning for 11 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 6,241 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 48th largest in North-Western since 2016 (of 286 with a page). Number 55 in Zambia in 2018, of 204.
Compare with…
- Burnt area
- 6,241ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 11days
- 18 Sept 2018 – 28 Sept 2018
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- districts
- Started on
- 18 Sept
- 2018
- Heat detections
- 242
- in a single hotspot: 30 MW
- Danger at start
- 55
- Extreme · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 113MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
11% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 417 ha in 2016, 583 ha in 2017. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 717 ha that had burned before.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Kasempa where it started6,298 ha reached on 18 Sept0.3 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept | 34.2 °C | 16 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 19 Sept | 33.4 °C | 14 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 20 Sept | 33.0 °C | 13 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 21 Sept | 32.8 °C | 18 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 22 Sept | 32.4 °C | 19 % | 50 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 60 |
| 23 Sept | 32.5 °C | 20 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 24 Sept | 32.0 °C | 26 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 25 Sept | 32.6 °C | 22 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 26 Sept | 34.2 °C | 20 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 27 Sept | 34.4 °C | 18 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 28 Sept | 34.4 °C | 20 % | 47 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 29 Sept after | 34.2 °C | 17 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 30 Sept after | 30.3 °C | 25 % | 64 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 61 |
| 1 Oct after | 27.4 °C | 35 % | 52 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 2 Oct after | 29.8 °C | 23 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 3 Oct after | 30.9 °C | 25 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 4 Oct after | 32.8 °C | 19 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 5 Oct after | 32.7 °C | 18 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 6 Oct after | 32.2 °C | 19 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 7 Oct after | 31.6 °C | 20 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 8 Oct after | 30.5 °C | 17 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 242Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Kasempa fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 18 September 2018 and 28 September 2018: 11 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 6,241 hectares (62.4 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Kasempa (6,298 ha, 0.3 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 34.4 °C, humidity dropped to 13 % and gusts hit 50 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 60, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Zambia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 242 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.