Skip to content
worldfires
BJ · Benin · –

Karimama fire, 24 November 2021 Karimama

Out · last detection 30 Nov 2021, 13:34 UTC

The fire started on 24 November 2021 in Karimama, Benin, and satellites saw it burning for 7 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,024 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 32th largest in Alibori since 2016 (of 448 with a page). Number 15 in Benin in 2021, of 128.

Burnt area
5,024ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
7days
24 Nov 2021 – 30 Nov 2021
Municipalities hit
1
communes
Started on
24 Nov
2021
Heat detections
171
in a single hotspot: 64 MW
Danger at start
43
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
303MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 24 Nov30 Nov
30 Nov 2021

How it evolved, day by day

24 Nov 2021 · 756 MW · 53 25 Nov 2021 · 204 MW · 37 26 Nov 2021 · 655 MW · 49 27 Nov 2021 · 179 MW · 22 28 Nov 2021 · 9 MW · 8 30 Nov 2021 · 17 MW · 2
24 Nov 26 Nov 28 Nov

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

39°high
37km/h · peak gust
11%lowest humidity

It had gone 35 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

38% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 419 ha in 2016, 929 ha in 2019, 666 ha in 2020. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,903 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.2% of the area of London (50 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Karimama where it started
    5,052 ha reached on 24 Nov
    0.8 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
24 Nov 38.1 °C 17 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
25 Nov 39.0 °C 17 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
26 Nov 37.9 °C 14 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
27 Nov 37.8 °C 13 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
28 Nov 37.6 °C 13 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
29 Nov 37.6 °C 13 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
30 Nov 37.2 °C 11 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
1 Dec after 36.7 °C 13 % 37 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
2 Dec after 36.8 °C 15 % 32 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
3 Dec after 36.0 °C 14 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
4 Dec after 35.8 °C 11 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52
5 Dec after 36.2 °C 13 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 50
6 Dec after 36.4 °C 12 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
7 Dec after 36.0 °C 13 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 53
8 Dec after 34.7 °C 12 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 58
9 Dec after 34.2 °C 10 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 56
10 Dec after 34.3 °C 11 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 52

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 43.0, a minimum humidity of 17% and 35 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 22.

FWI at the start 43.0
Minimum humidity 17 %
Days without rain 35
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Karimama fire, November 2016
1,572 ha 6 days FWI 43.9 Min. humidity 17 % 12 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

5 days
median duration
1,512 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
—
rain at the end (median; 0 of 22 had it)

It was 3.3 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 7 days, against 5 days.

Only 1 of its 22 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
37km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 30 Nov, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. None of its 22 twins had rain when they ended.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 17 Nov 2021
After · 7 Dec 2021

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 171Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Benin

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Karimama fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 24 November 2021 and 30 November 2021: 7 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,024 hectares (50.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Karimama (5,052 ha, 0.8 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 39.0 °C, humidity dropped to 11 % and gusts hit 37 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 53, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Benin (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 22. Their median duration was 5 days and their median area 1,512 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 1 of its 22 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 171 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.