Skip to content
worldfires
KH · Cambodia · –

Kaoh Nheaek fire, 15 January 2023 Kaoh Nheaek

Out · last detection 28 Jan 2023, 05:58 UTC

The fire started on 15 January 2023 in Kaoh Nheaek, Cambodia, and satellites saw it burning for 14 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,114 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 75th largest in Mondulkiri since 2016 (of 84 with a page). Number 23 in Cambodia in 2023, of 25.

Burnt area
2,114ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
14days
15 Jan 2023 – 28 Jan 2023
Municipalities hit
1
districts
Started on
15 Jan
2023
Heat detections
71
in a single hotspot: 78 MW
Danger at start
12
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
57MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 15 Jan28 Jan
28 Jan 2023

How it evolved, day by day

15 Jan 2023 · 22 MW · 2 17 Jan 2023 · 328 MW · 29 18 Jan 2023 · 83 MW · 20 19 Jan 2023 · 9 MW · 8 21 Jan 2023 · 7 MW · 2 24 Jan 2023 · 3 MW · 3 27 Jan 2023 · 7 MW · 6 28 Jan 2023 · 1 MW · 1
17 Jan 21 Jan 27 Jan

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

35°high
60km/h · peak gust
28%lowest humidity

It had gone one day without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

29% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 613 ha in 2017, 39 ha in 2021.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.3% of the area of London (21 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Kaoh Nheaek where it started
    2,127 ha reached on 15 Jan
    0.4 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
15 Jan 34.6 °C 28 % 20 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 12
16 Jan 32.8 °C 38 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 15
17 Jan 30.7 °C 46 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 15
18 Jan 29.8 °C 45 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 15
19 Jan 30.3 °C 43 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
20 Jan 30.4 °C 48 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 14
21 Jan 31.1 °C 49 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
22 Jan 32.8 °C 44 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 15
23 Jan 33.7 °C 44 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
24 Jan 32.7 °C 43 % 59 km/h 0.2 mm Moderate 21
25 Jan 28.5 °C 42 % 55 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
26 Jan 32.3 °C 40 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 18
27 Jan 31.4 °C 45 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
28 Jan 29.4 °C 40 % 60 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
29 Jan after 27.5 °C 46 % 51 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 21
30 Jan after 28.8 °C 39 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
31 Jan after 32.4 °C 41 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 19
1 Feb after 34.5 °C 39 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
2 Feb after 33.2 °C 50 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm High 22
3 Feb after 32.1 °C 45 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
4 Feb after 34.4 °C 38 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm High 23
5 Feb after 35.0 °C 33 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm High 24
6 Feb after 36.3 °C 30 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
7 Feb after 36.5 °C 29 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm High 27

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 12.1, a minimum humidity of 28% and 1 day without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 33.

FWI at the start 12.1
Minimum humidity 28 %
Days without rain 1
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Kaev Seima fire, February 2017
2,888 ha 12 days FWI 20.2 Min. humidity 31 % 96 km away, in 2017

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.4 mm on 21 Feb.

What happened to them

13 days
median duration
2,420 ha
median area
97 %
went past 1,000 ha
2.4 mm
rain at the end (median; 27 of 33 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (2,114 ha against a median of 2,420 ha) and lasted 14 days, against 13 days.

In 6 of 33, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.4 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
60km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 28 Jan, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. Twins with rain when they ended: 27 of 33, with a median of 2.4 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 8 Jan 2023
After · 4 Feb 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 15 January 2023 the air beside the fire reached 100 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 32: 2.1 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak100 µg/m³
Days over the guideline1 day
PM10143 µg/m³
Optical depth0.89
13 Jan16 Jan19 Jan22 Jan
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 71Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Cambodia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Kaoh Nheaek fire last?
According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 15 January 2023 to 28 January 2023 (14 days). The perimeter dates it from 15 January 2023 to 21 January 2023.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,114 hectares (21.1 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Kaoh Nheaek (2,127 ha, 0.4 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 34.6 °C, humidity dropped to 28 % and gusts hit 60 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 24, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Cambodia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 33. Their median duration was 13 days and their median area 2,420 ha; 97 % went past 1,000 ha. In 6 of 33, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 2.4 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 1 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Last day with fire: 21 January 2023 → 28 January 2023.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 15 January 2023 to 21 January 2023. 71 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.