Skip to content
worldfires
ET · Ethiopia · –

Kamashi fire, 3 February 2021 Gimbi, Kamashi

Out · last detection 8 Feb 2021, 10:40 UTC

The fire started on 3 February 2021 in Kamashi, Ethiopia, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,186 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 533th largest in Beneshangul Gumu since 2016 (of 635 with a page). Number 215 in Ethiopia in 2021, of 255.

Burnt area
2,186ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
6days
3 Feb 2021 – 8 Feb 2021
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
3 Feb
2021
Heat detections
74
in a single hotspot: 0 MW
Danger at start
41
Very high · FWI index
Average daily power
46MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 3 Feb8 Feb
8 Feb 2021

How it evolved, day by day

3 Feb 2021 · 4 MW · 2 4 Feb 2021 · 12 MW · 3 5 Feb 2021 · 55 MW · 34 6 Feb 2021 · 104 MW · 19 7 Feb 2021 · 27 MW · 11 8 Feb 2021 · 76 MW · 5
3 Feb 6 Feb

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

32°high
36km/h · peak gust
13%lowest humidity

It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.4% of the area of London (22 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. 1,237 ha
    1.3 %
  2. Kamashi where it started
    962 ha
    0.7 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area0.51 ha
Residents≈ 300

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.51 hectares of built-up land and about 300 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Very dry air: 25 % of the area in Ethiopia 60 days without rain: 37 % of the area in Ethiopia

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
3 Feb 32.4 °C 13 % 21 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
4 Feb 31.4 °C 15 % 28 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
5 Feb 30.5 °C 15 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
6 Feb 29.7 °C 13 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
7 Feb 30.6 °C 13 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
8 Feb 32.3 °C 16 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
9 Feb after 32.0 °C 18 % 22 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 40
10 Feb after 33.1 °C 16 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
11 Feb after 31.6 °C 14 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
12 Feb after 31.9 °C 12 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
13 Feb after 31.6 °C 13 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
14 Feb after 32.3 °C 13 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43
15 Feb after 32.1 °C 15 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
16 Feb after 32.9 °C 15 % 25 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
17 Feb after 31.6 °C 15 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
18 Feb after 30.8 °C 17 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 43

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 41.0, a minimum humidity of 13% and more than two months without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 19.

FWI at the start 41.0
Minimum humidity 13 %
Days without rain 60+
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Kiremu fire, January 2017
2,009 ha 10 days FWI 42.0 Min. humidity 13 % 114 km away, in 2017

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

10 days
median duration
3,177 ha
median area
11 %
went past 10,000 ha
—
rain at the end (median; 0 of 19 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (2,186 ha against a median of 3,177 ha) and lasted 6 days, against 10 days.

In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
36km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 8 Feb, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. None of its 19 twins had rain when they ended.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 27 Jan 2021
After · 15 Feb 2021

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 0Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Ethiopia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Kamashi fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 3 February 2021 and 8 February 2021: 6 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,186 hectares (21.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Gimbi (1,237 ha, 1.3 %); Kamashi (962 ha, 0.7 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 32.4 °C, humidity dropped to 13 % and gusts hit 36 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 46, class Very high.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Ethiopia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 19. Their median duration was 10 days and their median area 3,177 ha; 11 % went past 10,000 ha. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Satellite cross-check

History of this page · 2 Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
  1. Name: Gimbi → Kamashi.
  2. Name: Kamashi → Gimbi.

RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.