Burned area
satellite only808ha
Perimeter published by GWIS (Copernicus).
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus)
- Date
- 8 Sept 2017 – 13 Sept 2017
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page to compare it with.
AZ · Azerbaijan · –
Kalbajar District fire, 8 September 2017 Kalbajar District, Dashkasan District
Out · last measured on 13 Sept 2017
The fire started on 8 September 2017 in Kalbajar District, Azerbaijan, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 808 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 135th largest in Contiguous Azerbaijan since 2016 (of 278 with a page). Number 21 in Azerbaijan in 2017, of 36.
Use this data
Compare with…
Use this data
Fire page data · version 2026-10-24matches the official recordwith caveatssatellite onlymodel
When copying, the sentence is
Tick the figures you want: they make up the lede and the CSV.
Duration by satellite
satellite only6days
8 Sept 2017 to 13 Sept 2017: first and last day with fire on the page.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 8 Sept 2017 – 13 Sept 2017
+− cross-check
Satellites pass a few times a day and cloud or smoke can hide the fire: a lack of detections is not an official extinction. Each country’s emergency service declares a fire contained or out.
Start
satellite only8 Sept 2017
First day with fire seen by the satellites or the perimeter.
- Source
- GWIS (Copernicus) · NASA FIRMS · VIIRS
- Date
- 8 Sept 2017
+− cross-check
No official record is matched to this page, so the alert time and the cause are not known here.
Danger at the start
model9.8FWI · low
Fire Weather Index (Canadian system) computed by WorldFires for the day the fire started. Consecutive days without rain before: 0.
- Source
- WorldFires calculation (Canadian FWI system)
- Date
- 8 Sept 2017, local noon
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings
Weather during the fire
model23.3°C · 37% RH
High of 23.3 °C and minimum humidity of 37% on 13 September 2017; gusts of 29 km/h on 11 September 2017.
- Source
- weather model at the fire’s grid cell
- Date
- 8 Sept 2017 – 13 Sept 2017
- Model
- ERA5 0,25° (ECMWF · Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com
+− cross-check
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
This page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
-
· reconstructed weatherWeather and FWI computed from the ERA5 reanalysis
-
· reconstructed GHSLPopulation and built-up area computed
What was saved on 24 October 2026
Every night a snapshot of what the page shows is saved. If anything changes, it appears in the list as a log entry.
- Area
- 808 ha
- Dates
- 8 Sept 2017 – 13 Sept 2017
- Name
- Kalbajar District
- Official record
- —
Versioned permanent link
https://worldfires.org/en/fire/kalbajar-district-2017-09-3?v=2026-10-24A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
CSV for this fire kalbajar-district-2017-09-3.csv · daily, no individual hotspots
| fecha | focos_viirs | frp_mw | tmax_c | tmin_c | hr_min_pct | viento_max_kmh | racha_max_kmh | precip_mm | fwi | clase_fwi | dentro_del_incendio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-09-08 | 0 | 0 | 18.5 | 7 | 50 | 6.1 | 26.6 | 0 | 9.8 | bajo | 1 |
| 2017-09-09 | 0 | 0 | 21.7 | 5 | 32 | 5.2 | 23 | 0 | 11.6 | moderado | 1 |
| 2017-09-10 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 6.7 | 37 | 6 | 24.8 | 0 | 12.3 | moderado | 1 |
| 2017-09-11 | 0 | 0 | 18.9 | 12.1 | 58 | 6.2 | 28.8 | 0.4 | 9.8 | bajo | 1 |
| 2017-09-12 | 0 | 0 | 19.8 | 10.5 | 54 | 5.9 | 24.8 | 1.3 | 3.9 | muy_bajo | 1 |
| 2017-09-13 | 0 | 0 | 23.3 | 7.2 | 37 | 6.7 | 28.1 | 0 | 9.3 | bajo | 1 |
| 2017-09-14 | 0 | 0 | 21.9 | 10.4 | 43 | 6.1 | 25.6 | 0.1 | 10.6 | bajo | 0 |
| 2017-09-15 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 8.4 | 43 | 6 | 25.2 | 0 | 11.3 | moderado | 0 |
| 2017-09-16 | 0 | 0 | 20.5 | 9.4 | 50 | 6 | 27.7 | 1.9 | 3.2 | muy_bajo | 0 |
It is generated in your browser from this page’s data: one file per fire, aggregated by day and without individual hotspots.
Live widget for your story
It updates itself while the fire is still active and links to this page. Free, with the attribution shown at the bottom.
Sources for this page: GWIS (Copernicus), NASA FIRMS (VIIRS), ERA5 (ECMWF/Copernicus C3S) · Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0), GHSL (JRC). Open-Meteo.com · How we build fire pages: methodology
We have the GWIS perimeter for this fire, but the VIIRS sensors did not capture it in enough detail: no day-by-day evolution, but the split by municipality is there.
- Burnt area
- 808ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 6days
- 8 Sept 2017 – 13 Sept 2017
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- districts
- Started on
- 8 Sept
- 2017
- Danger at start
- 10
- Low · FWI index
Where it burned
The weather it burned in
23°high
29km/h · peak gust
32%lowest humidity
It had gone 0 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.9 mm on 16 Sept.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Kalbajar District where it started768 ha0.3 %
-
43 ha0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2015Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept | 18.5 °C | 50 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 10 |
| 9 Sept | 21.7 °C | 32 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 12 |
| 10 Sept | 23.0 °C | 37 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 12 |
| 11 Sept | 18.9 °C | 58 % | 29 km/h | 0.4 mm | Low 10 |
| 12 Sept | 19.8 °C | 54 % | 25 km/h | 1.3 mm | Very low 4 |
| 13 Sept | 23.3 °C | 37 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Low 9 |
| 14 Sept after | 21.9 °C | 43 % | 26 km/h | 0.1 mm | Low 11 |
| 15 Sept after | 22.0 °C | 43 % | 25 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 11 |
| 16 Sept after | 20.5 °C | 50 % | 28 km/h | 1.9 mm | Very low 3 |
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 9.8, a minimum humidity of 50% and rain the day before. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 32.
FWI at the start
9.8
Minimum humidity
50 %
Days without rain
0
this fire
chosen twins
rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Kalbajar District fire, 8 September 2017
808 ha
6 days
FWI 9.8
Min. humidity 50 %
Zangilan District fire, July 2018
1,047 ha
4 days
FWI 10.7
Min. humidity 49 %
130 km away, in 2018
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.
Kotayk fire, September 2018
314 ha
1 day
FWI 6.2
Min. humidity 50 %
108 km away, in 2018
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 2.5 mm on 2 Oct.
Qubadli District fire, September 2022
962 ha
2 days
FWI 12.5
Min. humidity 49 %
114 km away, in 2022
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.8 mm on 6 Oct.
Dedoplis Tskaro fire, October 2020
336 ha
1 day
FWI 9.7
Min. humidity 52 %
135 km away, in 2020
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 4.5 mm on 20 Oct.
Dedoplis Tskaro fire, July 2019
309 ha
2 days
FWI 8.9
Min. humidity 47 %
127 km away, in 2019
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.1 mm on 25 Jul.
What happened to them
- 3 days
- median duration
- 492 ha
- median area
- 22 %
- went past 1,000 ha
- 3.4 mm
- rain at the end (median; 28 of 32 had it)
It was 1.6 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 6 days, against 3 days.
Only 11 of its 32 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 4 of 32, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.4 mm.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
1.9 mmfirst rain
16 Sept3 days after it ended
29km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 13 Sept, and on 16 Sept 1.9 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 28 of 32, with a median of 3.4 mm.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
- Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
- Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
- Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
- Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
- They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
↔
Before · 1 Sept 2017
After · 20 Sept 2017
Sentinel-2 did not pass over on that day. Try another date, or use false colour, which is daily.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Other fires nearby
- 1,290 haKalbajar District9 November 2019 · 4 days · 4 km away
- 1,564 haVardenis29 September 2022 · 7 days · 17 km away
- 1,334 haKalbajar District24 October 2017 · 3 days · 22 km away
- 1,394 haKalbajar District13 September 2017 · 9 days · 27 km away
- 10,567 haKalbajar District2 September 2017 · 20 days · 29 km away
- 1,974 haKalbajar District14 November 2019 · 6 days · 29 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Kalbajar District fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 8 September 2017 and 13 September 2017: 6 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 808 hectares (8.1 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Kalbajar District (768 ha, 0.3 %); Dashkasan District (43 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 23.3 °C, humidity dropped to 32 % and gusts hit 29 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 12, class Moderate.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Azerbaijan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
- How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
- Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 32. Their median duration was 3 days and their median area 492 ha; 22 % went past 1,000 ha. Only 11 of its 32 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In 4 of 32, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 3.4 mm.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
RSS Changes to this page With cross-checks and a citable version
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. No Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.