Skip to content
worldfires
US · United States · –

Hughes fire, March 2017 Hughes

Out · last detection 10 Mar 2017, 19:47 UTC

The fire started on 3 March 2017 in Hughes, United States, and satellites saw it burning for 8 days. United States agencies (MTBS / NIFC) mapped an official burnt perimeter of 915 hectares, spread across a single county.

It is the 153th largest in Oklahoma since 2016 (of 282 with a page). Number 410 in United States in 2017, of 619.

The power measured by the satellite is low (12.4 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
915ha
official perimeter (MTBS / NIFC)
Duration
≈ 8days
3 Mar 2017 – 10 Mar 2017
Counties hit
1
counties
Started on
3 Mar
2017
Heat detections
26
in a single hotspot: 12 MW
Danger at start
20
Moderate · FWI index
Average daily power
15MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 3 Mar10 Mar
10 Mar 2017

How it evolved, day by day

3 Mar 2017 · 35 MW · 7 4 Mar 2017 · 13 MW · 9 7 Mar 2017 · 4 MW · 1 8 Mar 2017 · 8 MW · 2 9 Mar 2017 · 15 MW · 5 10 Mar 2017 · 17 MW · 2
3 Mar 7 Mar 9 Mar

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

25°high
75km/h · peak gust
13%lowest humidity

It had gone 3 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 3.3 mm on 11 Mar.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 0.6% of the area of London (9.2 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each county

  1. Hughes where it started
    907 ha reached on 3 Mar
    0.4 %

Burnt area inside each county, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2015
Built-up area0.30 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there were about 0.30 hectares of built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
3 Mar 20.4 °C 16 % 42 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 20
4 Mar 18.3 °C 28 % 55 km/h 0.0 mm High 26
5 Mar 15.9 °C 68 % 58 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 14
6 Mar 25.2 °C 57 % 75 km/h 1.2 mm Moderate 18
7 Mar 18.4 °C 13 % 66 km/h 11.7 mm Very low 1
8 Mar 23.0 °C 14 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 16
9 Mar 25.1 °C 51 % 58 km/h 0.0 mm Moderate 15
10 Mar 18.3 °C 36 % 49 km/h 0.2 mm Low 11
11 Mar after 14.3 °C 55 % 40 km/h 3.3 mm Very low 3

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 19.6, a minimum humidity of 16% and 3 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 32.

FWI at the start 19.6
Minimum humidity 16 %
Days without rain 3
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Nadel Fire, March 2025
970 ha 2 days FWI 18.6 Min. humidity 17 % 137 km away, in 2025

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

4 days
median duration
711 ha
median area
31 %
went past 1,000 ha
6.8 mm
rain at the end (median; 29 of 32 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (915 ha against a median of 711 ha) and lasted 8 days, against 4 days.

In 3 of 32, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 6.8 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

3.3 mmfirst rain
11 Marthe day after it ended
75km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 10 Mar, and on 11 Mar 3.3 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 29 of 32, with a median of 6.8 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 24 Feb 2017
After · 17 Mar 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 26Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in United States

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Hughes fire last?
The official perimeter only gives the start date (3 March 2017). The end comes from the heat detections inside the perimeter: it burned until 10 March 2017 (8 days from 3 March 2017), the last day with detections before more than 10 days in a row without any, so it is approximate.
How much area did it burn?
The official perimeter published by United States agencies (MTBS / NIFC) is 915 hectares (9.2 km²). Other tallies, such as daily incident reports, may give slightly different figures.
Which counties burned?
The fire only entered Hughes (907 ha, 0.4 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 25.2 °C, humidity dropped to 13 % and gusts hit 75 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 26, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the official burnt perimeter of United States agencies (MTBS / NIFC, public domain), NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of United States. It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 32. Their median duration was 4 days and their median area 711 ha; 31 % went past 1,000 ha. In 3 of 32, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 6.8 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 911 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 911.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: MTBS (US Geological Survey and US Forest Service), official.
  • The official perimeter has no end date: the end is the last day with VIIRS detections inside the perimeter before a gap of more than 10 days (150 days at most), so it is approximate. 26 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter is official and in the public domain. For past years it comes from MTBS (Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity), run by the U.S. Geological Survey and the USDA Forest Service, which map it on Landsat and Sentinel-2 imagery. For the current and last year it comes from WFIGS at the National Interagency Fire Center (NIFC): incident perimeters mapped by fire crews, aircraft and imagery. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. County boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Public Domain). The area per county is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from official figures.