Taunggyi fire, March 2025 Taunggyi, Hsihseng, Nyaungshwe
The fire started on 17 March 2025 in Taunggyi, Myanmar, and satellites saw it burning for 13 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 7,326 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 72th largest in Shan since 2016 (of 806 with a page). Number 11 in Myanmar in 2025, of 135.
Compare with…
- Burnt area
- 7,326ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 13days
- 17 Mar 2025 – 29 Mar 2025
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- municipalities
- Started on
- 17 Mar
- 2025
- Heat detections
- 281
- in a single hotspot: 40 MW
- Danger at start
- 43
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 154MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 20 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
99% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,999 ha in 2016, 3,119 ha in 2017, 4,109 ha in 2018, 2,895 ha in 2019, 3,065 ha in 2020, 4,753 ha in 2021, 2,226 ha in 2022, 1,677 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 7,221 ha that had burned before.
- 4,468 ha Hsihseng fire, March 2021 6,724 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,707 ha Taunggyi fire, March 2019 4,684 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,226 ha Taunggyi fire, March 2022 3,243 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,093 ha Taunggyi fire, April 2018 2,727 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,089 ha Taunggyi fire, March 2017 5,291 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,549 ha Taunggyi fire, March 2020 3,756 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,515 ha Taunggyi fire, March 2020 2,271 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,465 ha Nyaungshwe fire, March 2018 4,429 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Taunggyi where it started5,520 ha2.7 %
-
1,697 ha0.8 %
-
131 ha0.1 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025Inside the perimeter there were about 0.66 hectares of built-up land and about 350 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 Mar | 36.6 °C | 23 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 18 Mar | 36.3 °C | 26 % | 45 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 19 Mar | 34.9 °C | 29 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 41 |
| 20 Mar | 33.7 °C | 25 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 38 |
| 21 Mar | 31.8 °C | 41 % | 32 km/h | 0.7 mm | High 24 |
| 22 Mar | 32.2 °C | 43 % | 31 km/h | 0.6 mm | High 23 |
| 23 Mar | 33.3 °C | 38 % | 34 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 27 |
| 24 Mar | 34.4 °C | 28 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 25 Mar | 33.9 °C | 27 % | 37 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 35 |
| 26 Mar | 33.8 °C | 28 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 27 Mar | 35.0 °C | 26 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 28 Mar | 34.1 °C | 23 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 29 Mar | 34.6 °C | 20 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 38 |
| 30 Mar after | 37.3 °C | 15 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 31 Mar after | 36.4 °C | 22 % | 46 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 1 Apr after | 37.2 °C | 15 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 2 Apr after | 36.9 °C | 24 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 3 Apr after | 37.0 °C | 26 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 4 Apr after | 36.3 °C | 26 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 5 Apr after | 35.3 °C | 30 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 6 Apr after | 30.9 °C | 38 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 7 Apr after | 28.8 °C | 49 % | 20 km/h | 0.5 mm | High 23 |
| 8 Apr after | 33.0 °C | 31 % | 38 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 34 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 20 March 2025 the air beside the fire reached 145 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 93: 6.2 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 281Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 18,198 haTaunggyi15 March 2026 · 16 days · 6 km away
- 6,724 haHsihsengMarch 2021 · 8 days · 10 km away
- 7,858 haPinlaungJanuary 2022 · 12 days · 18 km away
- 7,895 haNyaungshwe1 February 2020 · 9 days · 19 km away
- 7,232 haNyaungshwe16 January 2023 · 8 days · 19 km away
- 7,576 haHsihseng8 February 2026 · 15 days · 26 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Taunggyi fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 17 March 2025 and 29 March 2025: 13 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 7,326 hectares (73.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Taunggyi (5,520 ha, 2.7 %); Hsihseng (1,697 ha, 0.8 %); Nyaungshwe (131 ha, 0.1 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.6 °C, humidity dropped to 20 % and gusts hit 45 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 45, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Myanmar (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 281 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.