Heiban fire, 4 November 2016 Heiban
The fire started on 4 November 2016 in Heiban, Sudan, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 4,192 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 95th largest in South Kordofan since 2016 (of 442 with a page). Number 41 in Sudan in 2016, of 169.
- Burnt area
- 4,192ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 6days
- 4 Nov 2016 – 9 Nov 2016
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- localities
- Started on
- 4 Nov
- 2016
- Heat detections
- 84
- in a single hotspot: 108 MW
- Danger at start
- 48
- Very high · FWI index
- Energy released
- 1.1GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 23 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
What happened to each town
-
Heiban where it started4,221 ha reached on 4 Nov1.2 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov | 36.4 °C | 16 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 5 Nov | 35.9 °C | 16 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 6 Nov | 36.3 °C | 15 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 7 Nov | 36.4 °C | 15 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 8 Nov | 35.9 °C | 15 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 9 Nov | 36.4 °C | 16 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 10 Nov after | 36.6 °C | 14 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 11 Nov after | 36.9 °C | 13 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 12 Nov after | 37.1 °C | 13 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 13 Nov after | 37.7 °C | 11 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 14 Nov after | 37.2 °C | 11 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 15 Nov after | 37.5 °C | 10 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 16 Nov after | 37.3 °C | 10 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
| 17 Nov after | 36.9 °C | 11 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 18 Nov after | 36.4 °C | 15 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 19 Nov after | 36.8 °C | 16 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 84Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 3,467 haGhadeer October 2026 · 9 days · 9 km away
- 3,586 haAbu Jubayhah6 December 2016 · 4 days · 18 km away
- 3,958 haHeiban22 December 2021 · 3 days · 22 km away
- 3,555 haAbu Jubayhah5 December 2025 · 2 days · 24 km away
- 4,047 haGhadeer25 October 2017 · 3 days · 35 km away
- 5,359 haGhadeerOctober 2016 · 5 days · 39 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Heiban fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 4 November 2016 and 9 November 2016: 6 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 4,192 hectares (41.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Heiban (4,221 ha, 1.2 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.4 °C, humidity dropped to 15 % and gusts hit 41 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 50, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Sudan (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.