Gummi fire, December 2022 Gummi, Bukkuyum, Wasagu-Danko
The fire started on 2 December 2022 in Gummi, Nigeria, and satellites saw it burning for 9 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 12,887 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 8th largest in Zamfara since 2016 (of 209 with a page). Number 3 in Nigeria in 2022, of 125.
Compare with…
Suggestions: Gummi · 2021Gummi · 2019Gummi · 2020Gummi · 2021
- Burnt area
- 12,887ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 9days
- 2 Dec 2022 – 10 Dec 2022
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- local government areas
- Started on
- 2 Dec
- 2022
- Heat detections
- 481
- in a single hotspot: 179 MW
- Danger at start
- 45
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 402MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 49 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
86% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 3,233 ha in 2016, 2,821 ha in 2017, 1,129 ha in 2018, 3,489 ha in 2019, 6,242 ha in 2020, 8,815 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 11,064 ha that had burned before.
- 6,803 ha Gummi fire, December 2021 16,638 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 2,420 ha Gummi fire, January 2019 3,419 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,896 ha Gummi fire, January 2020 13,736 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,823 ha Gummi fire, January 2021 5,926 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,366 ha Gummi fire, December 2016 3,959 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 416 ha Gummi fire, December 2020 3,596 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 87 ha Gummi fire, January 2020 3,010 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 63 ha Gummi fire, December 2021 3,091 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Gummi where it started12,817 ha reached on 25 Nov4.3 %
-
91 ha reached on 4 Dec0.0 %
-
49 ha reached on 7 Dec0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020Inside the perimeter there were about 5.7 hectares of built-up land and about 950 residents (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 Dec | 35.8 °C | 19 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 3 Dec | 36.2 °C | 20 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 4 Dec | 36.8 °C | 16 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 5 Dec | 35.9 °C | 16 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 52 |
| 6 Dec | 33.8 °C | 11 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 7 Dec | 35.4 °C | 16 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 8 Dec | 34.7 °C | 14 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 9 Dec | 33.7 °C | 13 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 57 |
| 10 Dec | 33.8 °C | 12 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 11 Dec after | 34.0 °C | 14 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 12 Dec after | 34.6 °C | 15 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 13 Dec after | 34.7 °C | 13 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 14 Dec after | 34.5 °C | 12 % | 39 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 15 Dec after | 35.6 °C | 15 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 16 Dec after | 35.3 °C | 14 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 54 |
| 17 Dec after | 33.7 °C | 17 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 18 Dec after | 32.4 °C | 17 % | 40 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 56 |
| 19 Dec after | 33.7 °C | 13 % | 44 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 58 |
| 20 Dec after | 33.4 °C | 13 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 59 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 6 December 2022 the air beside the fire reached 71 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 51: 3.4 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 481Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 16,638 haGummi1 December 2021 · 13 days · 3 km away
- 6,295 haGummiDecember 2025 · 8 days · 4 km away
- 13,736 haGummi19 January 2020 · 15 days · 9 km away
- 7,394 haGummi15 November 2025 · 5 days · 9 km away
- 6,047 haWasagu-DankoDecember 2025 · 4 days · 11 km away
- 5,926 haGummiJanuary 2021 · 12 days · 11 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Gummi fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 2 December 2022 and 10 December 2022: 9 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 12,887 hectares (128.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Gummi (12,817 ha, 4.3 %); Bukkuyum (91 ha, 0.0 %); Wasagu-Danko (49 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 36.8 °C, humidity dropped to 11 % and gusts hit 43 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 57, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Nigeria (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings ›
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 481 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.