Skip to content
worldfires
TR · Türkiye · –

Güçlükonak fire, 2 August 2020 Güçlükonak, Şırnak merkez

Out · last detection 8 Aug 2020, 09:58 UTC

The fire started on 2 August 2020 in Güçlükonak, Türkiye, and satellites saw it burning for 7 days. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 5,712 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the largest fire in Şırnak since 2016 (of 192 with a page). The largest in Türkiye in 2020, of 212.

The power measured by the satellite is low (23.0 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
5,712ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
7days
2 Aug 2020 – 8 Aug 2020
Municipalities hit
2
districts
Started on
2 Aug
2020
Heat detections
144
in a single hotspot: 23 MW
Danger at start
60
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
110MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 2 Aug8 Aug
8 Aug 2020

How it evolved, day by day

2 Aug 2020 · 25 MW · 13 3 Aug 2020 · 64 MW · 22 4 Aug 2020 · 290 MW · 33 5 Aug 2020 · 142 MW · 41 6 Aug 2020 · 120 MW · 17 7 Aug 2020 · 40 MW · 10 8 Aug 2020 · 93 MW · 8
2 Aug 4 Aug 6 Aug 8 Aug

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

33°high
52km/h · peak gust
13%lowest humidity

It had gone 41 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

32% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,200 ha in 2016, 1,114 ha in 2018. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,856 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 3.6% of the area of London (57 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Güçlükonak 13,091 inhabitants · 7.9 km from the centre where it started
    3,583 ha reached on 2 Aug
    7.2 %
  2. Şırnak merkez Şırnak 467,810 inhabitants · 31.6 km from the centre
    2,138 ha reached on 2 Aug
    1.2 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Scrub and transitional woodland48 %
  • Broadleaved forest26 %
  • Mixed forest19 %
  • Other natural land6.7 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

Checked against the press

Checked on 29 September 2026

We checked this page against 2 sources published once the fire was out. This is what they add:

According to the sources, several fires that ended up merging:
  • Meseta de Şerevan / Çemê Mezin / Xare Kuna y otros 3 puntos 1 August 2020
  • Kırkkuyu (Deşta Lala) 7 August 2020
  • Şêwe Mezrası 10 August 2020

Sources

Official figures are measured differently from satellite ones and sometimes cover only part of the fire.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Strong wind: 38 % of the area in Türkiye

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
2 Aug 31.5 °C 15 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 60
3 Aug 31.8 °C 16 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
4 Aug 32.0 °C 16 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
5 Aug 31.1 °C 16 % 33 km/h 0.1 mm Very high 48
6 Aug 33.0 °C 13 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
7 Aug 33.0 °C 14 % 44 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
8 Aug 32.0 °C 13 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
9 Aug after 31.8 °C 14 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 51
10 Aug after 30.0 °C 23 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
11 Aug after 29.8 °C 18 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
12 Aug after 31.5 °C 20 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
13 Aug after 31.8 °C 17 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
14 Aug after 31.7 °C 16 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 46
15 Aug after 31.0 °C 19 % 31 km/h 0.1 mm Very high 44
16 Aug after 31.0 °C 20 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
17 Aug after 30.5 °C 13 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50
18 Aug after 31.2 °C 12 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 47
19 Aug after 31.8 °C 11 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
20 Aug after 31.9 °C 9 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 50

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 59.8, a minimum humidity of 15% and 41 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 15.

FWI at the start 59.8
Minimum humidity 15 %
Days without rain 41
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Midyat fire, August 2016
578 ha 1 day FWI 58.5 Min. humidity 16 % 51 km away, in 2016

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

1 day
median duration
560 ha
median area
27 %
went past 1,000 ha
—
rain at the end (median; 0 of 15 had it)

It was 10.2 times larger than the median of its twins and lasted 7 days, against 1 day.

None of its 15 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
52km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 8 Aug, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain. None of its 15 twins had rain when they ended.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 26 Jul 2020
After · 15 Aug 2020

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 5 August 2020 the air beside the fire reached 29 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 22: 1.5 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak29 µg/m³
Days over the guideline6 days
PM1044 µg/m³
31 Jul3 Aug6 Aug9 Aug12 Aug
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 144Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Türkiye

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Güçlükonak fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 2 August 2020 and 8 August 2020: 7 days between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 5,712 hectares (57.1 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Güçlükonak (3,583 ha, 7.2 %); Şırnak merkez (2,138 ha, 1.2 %).
Did the fire reach a town?
The fire started in Güçlükonak and came within 7.9 km of its centre. That is the distance from the perimeter, or the nearest hotspot, to the point marking the centre; it does not mean it entered the houses.
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 33.0 °C, humidity dropped to 13 % and gusts hit 52 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 60, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Türkiye (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 15. Their median duration was 1 day and their median area 560 ha; 27 % went past 1,000 ha. None of its 15 twins burned more. The weather on the first day does not explain everything: the wind in the following days, the fuel and the firefighting also count. In none of them did 1 mm fall in the ten days after the end: they all went out without rain.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 144 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Checked against news and agencies: 2 confirmed sources.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Open Data Commons Open Database License 1.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.