Skip to content
worldfires
HR · Croatia ·

Grad Slunj fire, 1 March 2021 Grad Slunj

Out · last detection 1 Mar 2021, 12:38 UTC

The fire started on 1 March 2021 in Grad Slunj, Croatia, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus mapped a burnt perimeter of 112 hectares from satellite imagery, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 17th largest in Karlovac since 2016 (of 19 with a page). Number 19 in Croatia in 2021, of 21.

The power measured by the satellite is low (14.8 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.

Burnt area
112ha
Copernicus perimeter
Duration
1day
1 Mar 2021 – 1 Mar 2021
Municipalities hit
1
municipalities
Started on
1 Mar
2021
Heat detections
7
in a single hotspot: 15 MW
Danger at start
4
Very low · FWI index
Average daily power
59MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 1 Mar1 Mar

How it evolved, day by day

1 Mar 2021 · 59 MW · 7

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

12°high
29km/h · peak gust
43%lowest humidity

It had gone 17 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 5.5 mm on 5 Mar.

This area had burned before

74% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 35 ha in 2017, 55 ha in 2020. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 83 ha that had burned before.

What happened to each town

  1. Grad Slunj where it started
    112 ha reached on 1 Mar
    0.3 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the official perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

What burned

  • Scrub and transitional woodland61 %
  • Artificial surfaces38 %
  • Broadleaved forest0.9 %

Land cover inside the perimeter according to Corine Land Cover, as reported by Copernicus.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
1 Mar 12.4 °C 43 % 29 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 4
2 Mar after 14.2 °C 37 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 4
3 Mar after 18.1 °C 24 % 17 km/h 0.0 mm Low 6
4 Mar after 16.9 °C 29 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Low 8
5 Mar after 14.2 °C 49 % 44 km/h 5.5 mm Very low 0

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 4.5, a minimum humidity of 43% and 17 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 16.

FWI at the start 4.5
Minimum humidity 43 %
Days without rain 17
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Bosansko Grahovo fire, March 2017
726 ha 3 days FWI 4.2 Min. humidity 43 % 131 km away, in 2017

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 4.1 mm on 26 Mar.

What happened to them

2 days
median duration
230 ha
median area
12 %
went past 1,000 ha
4.4 mm
rain at the end (median; 16 of 16 had it)

It stayed below its twins: 112 ha against a median of 230 ha. It lasted 1 day, against 2 days.

All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 4.4 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

5.5 mmfirst rain
5 Mar4 days after it ended
29km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 1 Mar, and on 5 Mar 5.5 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 16 of 16, with a median of 4.4 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 22 Feb 2021
After · 8 Mar 2021

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 27 February 2021 the air beside the fire reached 38 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 23: 1.5 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak38 µg/m³
Days over the guideline3 days
PM1050 µg/m³
27 Feb1 Mar3 Mar
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 7Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Croatia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Grad Slunj fire last?
Copernicus dates it between 1 March 2021 and 1 March 2021: 1 day between the first and last image with fire.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter Copernicus measured from satellite imagery is 112 hectares (1.1 km²). Official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Grad Slunj (112 ha, 0.3 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 12.4 °C, humidity dropped to 43 % and gusts hit 29 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 4, class Very low.
Where does this data come from?
From the EFFIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Croatia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 16. Their median duration was 2 days and their median area 230 ha; 12 % went past 1,000 ha. All of them had rain in the ten days after the end: the first rainy day brought a median of 4.4 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 112 · 193 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 112 · 193.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: EFFIS (Copernicus), mapped on satellite imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 7 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter and land cover come from the Copernicus European Forest Fire Information System (EFFIS), measured on MODIS and Sentinel-2 imagery and published under CC BY 4.0. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ slightly from each country’s official figure.