Skip to content
worldfires
AR · Argentina · –

General Güemes fire, 23 January 2022 General Güemes

Out · last detection 26 Jan 2022, 17:18 UTC

The fire started on 23 January 2022 in General Güemes, Argentina, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,796 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 88th largest in Chaco since 2016 (of 138 with a page). Number 327 in Argentina in 2022, of 441.

Burnt area
1,796ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
4days
23 Jan 2022 – 26 Jan 2022
Municipalities hit
1
departments
Started on
23 Jan
2022
Heat detections
79
in a single hotspot: 470 MW
Danger at start
50
Extreme · FWI index
Average daily power
447MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 23 Jan26 Jan
26 Jan 2022

How it evolved, day by day

23 Jan 2022 · 979 MW · 9 24 Jan 2022 · 300 MW · 34 25 Jan 2022 · 453 MW · 29 26 Jan 2022 · 56 MW · 7
23 Jan 24 Jan 25 Jan 26 Jan

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

40°high
49km/h · peak gust
28%lowest humidity

It had gone 5 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 115.1 mm on 27 Jan.

This area had burned before

91% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 808 ha in 2018, 135 ha in 2019, 1,725 ha in 2020, 262 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,636 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 1.1% of the area of London (18 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. General Güemes where it started
    1,801 ha reached on 23 Jan
    0.1 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1 ha
Residents< 20

Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Started with Extreme FWI: 19 % of the area in Argentina

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
23 Jan 39.8 °C 31 % 49 km/h 0.1 mm Extreme 50
24 Jan 40.0 °C 30 % 32 km/h 0.3 mm High 36
25 Jan 40.3 °C 30 % 45 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 49
26 Jan 40.3 °C 28 % 37 km/h 3.1 mm Extreme 52
27 Jan after 27.6 °C 81 % 30 km/h 115.1 mm Very low 0

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 50.3, a minimum humidity of 31% and 5 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 33.

FWI at the start 50.3
Minimum humidity 31 %
Days without rain 5
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Mariscal Estigarribia fire, February 2020
1,687 ha 13 days FWI 50.8 Min. humidity 31 % 195 km away, in 2020

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

5 days
median duration
2,123 ha
median area
100 %
went past 1,000 ha
6.3 mm
rain at the end (median; 25 of 33 had it)

It burned an area similar to its twins (1,796 ha against a median of 2,123 ha) and lasted 4 days, against 5 days.

In 8 of 33, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 6.3 mm.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

115.1 mmfirst rain
27 Janthe day after it ended
49km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 26 Jan, and on 27 Jan 115.1 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out. Twins with rain when they ended: 25 of 33, with a median of 6.3 mm.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 16 Jan 2022
After · 2 Feb 2022

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 79Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Argentina

Frequently asked questions

How long did the General Güemes fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 23 January 2022 and 26 January 2022: 4 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,796 hectares (18.0 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered General Güemes (1,801 ha, 0.1 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 40.3 °C, humidity dropped to 28 % and gusts hit 49 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 52, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Argentina (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
How did the fires that started in similar weather in this area end?
Fires less than 250 km away that started since 2016 with a similar FWI, humidity and dry spell: 33. Their median duration was 5 days and their median area 2,123 ha; 100 % went past 1,000 ha. In 8 of 33, not even 1 mm fell in the ten days after the end: they went out without rain. In the rest, the first rainy day brought a median of 6.3 mm.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 911 · 100 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 911 · 100.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 79 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.