Felipe Carrillo Puerto fire, August 2020
Felipe Carrillo Puerto
Out · last detection 2 Sept 2020, 07:41 UTC
The fire started on 26 August 2020 in Felipe Carrillo Puerto, Mexico, and satellites saw it burning for 8 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 9,022 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality. According to CONAFOR, it was detected on 26 August 2020 and declared extinguished on 4 September 2020.
It is the largest fire in Quintana Roo since 2016 (of 40 with a page). Number 7 in Mexico in 2020, of 241.
This is an index computed from weather model data, not a measurement of the fire nor an official warning. Danger warnings are issued by each country’s authority. Emergency number and official warnings ›
Weather during the fire
model
33.3°C · 68% RH
High of 33.3 °C and minimum humidity of 68% on 28 August 2020; gusts of 54 km/h on 28 August 2020.
These are model values for a cell of about 25 km, not from a weather station: they may differ from what was measured on the ground.
ⓘThis page’s change log has been kept since 24 October 2026: every night what it publishes is compared and the difference is logged. Anything earlier is reconstructed from each source’s date and marked as reconstructed.
Show
· reconstructedofficial
Matched with the official CONAFOR record
Matches: 8,766 ha in the official record (records: 1).
A version keeps the area, dates, name and official record; the area as it was logged (changes under 2% are not logged). The map, hotspots and weather always show today’s data.
Citation
A lede of about 60 words figures only, no adjectives
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2020
Built-up area< 0.1ha
Residents< 20
Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2020, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
Day
High
Min. humidity
Peak gust
Rain
Danger (FWI)
26 Aug
32.9 °C
64 %
45 km/h
5.7 mm
Very low 0
27 Aug
30.8 °C
80 %
48 km/h
12.8 mm
Very low 0
28 Aug
33.3 °C
68 %
54 km/h
4.3 mm
Very low 0
29 Aug
32.2 °C
71 %
50 km/h
1.3 mm
Very low 1
30 Aug
32.7 °C
67 %
39 km/h
0.0 mm
Very low 2
31 Aug
32.5 °C
64 %
34 km/h
0.0 mm
Very low 3
1 Sept
32.5 °C
69 %
34 km/h
1.1 mm
Very low 2
2 Sept
31.7 °C
74 %
45 km/h
8.1 mm
Very low 0
3 Sept after
31.3 °C
78 %
40 km/h
13.8 mm
Very low 0
Its twins: fires that started in the same weather
It started with an FWI of 0.4, a minimum humidity of 64% and rain the day before. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 13.
FWI at the start0.4
Minimum humidity64 %
Days without rain0
this firechosen twinsrest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar
Outlines of the closest twins
This fire · Felipe Carrillo Puerto fire, August 2020
9,022 ha8 daysFWI 0.4Min. humidity 64 %
Felipe Carrillo Puerto fire, July 2019
3,592 ha13 daysFWI 1.9Min. humidity 66 %40 km away, in 2019
First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: 1.7 mm on 21 Jul.
Fires in the area that started in similar weather: 13. With fewer than 15 we give no figures: they would be more noise than signal.
This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it
How it ended
13.8 mmfirst rain
3 Septthe day after it ended
54km/h · max. gust
It was considered over on 2 Sept, and on 3 Sept 13.8 mm fell. We do not know whether the rain or the firefighters put it out.
Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
How a twin is chosen
Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.
How long did the Felipe Carrillo Puerto fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 26 August 2020 and 2 September 2020: 8 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter. According to CONAFOR, it was detected on 26 August 2020 and declared extinguished on 4 September 2020.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 9,022 hectares (90.2 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Felipe Carrillo Puerto (9,064 ha, 0.7 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 33.3 °C, humidity dropped to 64 % and gusts hit 54 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 3, class Very low.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mexico (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
⚑Report an errorHow we know this›
Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 264 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
Compared with CONAFOR: 8,766 official ha against 9,022 ha of perimeter; they agree within 25%.
Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2020, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.