Esan West fire, 11 February 2017 Esan West, Esan Central, Etsako West
The fire started on 11 February 2017 in Esan West, Nigeria, and satellites saw it burning for 13 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 2,659 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the 49th largest in Edo since 2016 (of 78 with a page). Number 86 in Nigeria in 2017, of 155.
The power measured by the satellite is low (29.5 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
Compare with…
- Burnt area
- 2,659ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 13days
- 11 Feb 2017 – 23 Feb 2017
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- local government areas
- Started on
- 11 Feb
- 2017
- Heat detections
- 95
- in a single hotspot: 30 MW
- Danger at start
- 47
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 55MW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 13 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.0 mm on 27 Feb.
This area had burned before
No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Esan West where it started2,399 ha reached on 11 Feb4.7 %
-
270 ha reached on 14 Feb1.1 %
-
7 ha0.0 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2015Inside the perimeter there were about 13 hectares of built-up land and about 1,500 residents (GHSL 2015, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 Feb | 38.5 °C | 6 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 15 Feb | 37.2 °C | 16 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 16 Feb | 36.0 °C | 15 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 17 Feb | 36.2 °C | 6 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 49 |
| 18 Feb | 35.0 °C | 9 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 19 Feb | 36.2 °C | 10 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 20 Feb | 36.0 °C | 17 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 21 Feb | 37.5 °C | 18 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 22 Feb | 37.7 °C | 19 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 23 Feb | 37.8 °C | 18 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 24 Feb after | 39.5 °C | 18 % | 41 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 53 |
| 25 Feb after | 38.5 °C | 20 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 50 |
| 26 Feb after | 36.1 °C | 34 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 27 Feb after | 35.4 °C | 40 % | 36 km/h | 1.0 mm | High 27 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
Detections table · 95Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 8,760 haEsan West11 February 2023 · 12 days · 17 km away
- 5,728 haUhunmwondeFebruary 2021 · 6 days · 25 km away
- 5,508 haEsan WestFebruary 2024 · 8 days · 26 km away
- 5,548 haEsan West14 February 2017 · 14 days · 28 km away
- 9,086 haUhunmwonde22 January 2016 · 19 days · 35 km away
- 10,826 haUhunmwondeJanuary 2020 · 29 days · 40 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Esan West fire last?
- According to the heat detections seen by satellite inside the perimeter, it burned from 11 February 2017 to 23 February 2017 (13 days). The perimeter dates it from 14 February 2017 to 19 February 2017.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 2,659 hectares (26.6 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Esan West (2,399 ha, 4.7 %); Esan Central (270 ha, 1.1 %); Etsako West (7 ha, 0.0 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 38.5 °C, humidity dropped to 6 % and gusts hit 34 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 49, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Nigeria (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 112 · Emergency number and official warnings ›
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
- Dates adjusted with the VIIRS detections inside the perimeter, which said 14 February 2017 to 19 February 2017. 95 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2015, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.