Dungu fire, February 2025 Dungu
The fire started on 1 February 2025 in Dungu, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and satellites saw it burning for 11 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 16,485 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.
It is the 27th largest in Upper Uele since 2016 (of 101 with a page). Number 7 in Democratic Republic of the Congo in 2025, of 118.
Compare with…
Suggestions: Dungu · 2024Dungu · 2020Dungu · 2023Dungu · 2020
- Burnt area
- 16,485ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 11days
- 1 Feb 2025 – 11 Feb 2025
- Municipalities hit
- 1
- territories
- Started on
- 1 Feb
- 2025
- Heat detections
- 771
- in a single hotspot: 191 MW
- Danger at start
- 47
- Very high · FWI index
- Average daily power
- 1.2GW
- detected power per day, on average
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
100% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 8,229 ha in 2016, 9,722 ha in 2017, 5,296 ha in 2018, 6,534 ha in 2019, 13,725 ha in 2020, 9,582 ha in 2021, 8,028 ha in 2022, 5,805 ha in 2023, 10,940 ha in 2024. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 16,588 ha that had burned before.
- 10,919 ha Dungu fire, January 2024 43,011 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 7,931 ha Dungu fire, January 2020 123,194 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 5,269 ha Dungu fire, January 2023 35,499 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 4,408 ha Dungu fire, February 2020 11,670 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 4,291 ha Dungu fire, January 2021 8,255 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 4,099 ha Dungu fire, January 2022 7,457 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 3,353 ha Faradje fire, January 2019 80,671 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 3,259 ha Dungu fire, January 2018 5,793 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
How big is it?
London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).
Paris boundary: geoBoundaries · Institut national de l'information géographique et forestière (IGN-F) (Etalab Open License 2.0).
Madrid boundary: geoBoundaries · Open Data ESRI, IGN Central Registry of Cartography Area (CC BY 4.0).
Berlin boundary: geoBoundaries · Federal Agency for Cartography and Geodesy (dl-de/by-2-0).
This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.
What happened to each town
-
Dungu where it started16,603 ha reached on 30 Jan0.5 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
People and buildings inside the perimeter
GHSL 2025Inside the perimeter there was no noticeable built-up land and almost nobody lived there (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).
This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.
Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 Jan | 33.6 °C | 12 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 47 |
| 31 Jan | 33.6 °C | 13 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 1 Feb | 35.3 °C | 14 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 2 Feb | 36.0 °C | 15 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 3 Feb | 36.4 °C | 16 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 4 Feb | 35.9 °C | 18 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 5 Feb | 36.5 °C | 17 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 45 |
| 6 Feb | 36.8 °C | 17 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 7 Feb | 37.2 °C | 14 % | 43 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 55 |
| 8 Feb | 34.9 °C | 20 % | 28 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 9 Feb | 35.4 °C | 22 % | 27 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 10 Feb | 36.7 °C | 16 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 44 |
| 11 Feb | 37.1 °C | 20 % | 42 km/h | 0.0 mm | Extreme 51 |
| 12 Feb after | 36.8 °C | 17 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 13 Feb after | 35.2 °C | 25 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 43 |
| 14 Feb after | 36.6 °C | 18 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 15 Feb after | 34.6 °C | 24 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 16 Feb after | 35.7 °C | 24 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 42 |
| 17 Feb after | 37.0 °C | 20 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 18 Feb after | 33.9 °C | 28 % | 26 km/h | 0.3 mm | Very high 42 |
| 19 Feb after | 35.8 °C | 24 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 40 |
| 20 Feb after | 36.2 °C | 17 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
| 21 Feb after | 37.3 °C | 13 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 48 |
| 22 Feb after | 37.3 °C | 15 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 46 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 13 February 2025 the air beside the fire reached 139 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 83: 5.5 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 771Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
- 43,011 haDungu26 January 2024 · 18 days · 7 km away
- 58,059 haDungu12 January 2026 · 26 days · 14 km away
- 38,040 haDungu7 January 2017 · 14 days · 14 km away
- 38,657 haDungu2 January 2016 · 17 days · 16 km away
- 123,194 haDungu22 January 2020 · 12 days · 28 km away
- 80,671 haFaradjeJanuary 2019 · 25 days · 35 km away
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Dungu fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 1 February 2025 and 11 February 2025: 11 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 16,485 hectares (164.8 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire only entered Dungu (16,603 ha, 0.5 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 37.2 °C, humidity dropped to 12 % and gusts hit 43 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 55, class Extreme.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Democratic Republic of the Congo (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.
No changes since 24 October 2026.
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
How we know this
- Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery; 2 polygons grouped in this page.
- Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 771 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
- We have not matched this page with any official record.
- Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
- Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.