Skip to content
worldfires
AU · Australia · –

Donnybrook-Balingup fire, January 2023 Donnybrook-Balingup

Out · last detection 15 Jan 2023, 17:47 UTC

The fire started on 10 January 2023 in Donnybrook-Balingup, Australia, and satellites saw it burning for 6 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 7,126 hectares from heat detections, spread across a single municipality.

It is the 280th largest in Western Australia since 2016 (of 427 with a page). Number 105 in Australia in 2023, of 157.

Compare with…
Burnt area
7,126ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
6days
10 Jan 2023 – 15 Jan 2023
Municipalities hit
1
local government areas
Started on
10 Jan
2023
Heat detections
437
in a single hotspot: 328 MW
Danger at start
37
High · FWI index
Average daily power
809MW
detected power per day, on average

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 10 Jan15 Jan
15 Jan 2023

How it evolved, day by day

10 Jan 2023 · 3,132 MW · 25 11 Jan 2023 · 664 MW · 235 12 Jan 2023 · 166 MW · 42 13 Jan 2023 · 137 MW · 18 14 Jan 2023 · 755 MW · 112 15 Jan 2023 · 3 MW · 5
10 Jan 12 Jan 14 Jan

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

34°high
53km/h · peak gust
25%lowest humidity

It had gone 32 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.

This area had burned before

37% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,965 ha in 2016, 201 ha in 2017, 342 ha in 2019, 272 ha in 2021, 613 ha in 2022. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 2,622 ha that had burned before.

How big is it?

10 km
It burned the equivalent of 4.5% of the area of London (71 km² against 1,583 km²).

London boundary: geoBoundaries · Office for National Statistics (Open Government Licence v3.0).

This compares size, not location: both shapes are at the same scale, north up, centred on each other.

What happened to each town

  1. Donnybrook-Balingup where it started
    7,134 ha reached on 10 Jan
    4.6 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance runs from the point marking the centre of each area to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

People and buildings inside the perimeter

GHSL 2025
Built-up area6.8 ha
Residents≈ 100

Inside the perimeter there were about 6.8 hectares of built-up land and about 100 residents (GHSL 2025, satellite-based estimate).

This is an estimate on 100 m cells, made from satellite imagery and census data: it does not mean that homes burned or that anyone was harmed. The perimeter also contains land that never burned. The GHSL 2025 epoch is a projection made from 2020 and earlier data.

Source: Global Human Settlement Layer (GHS-BUILT-S and GHS-POP R2023A), European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC), © European Union, CC BY 4.0. Sum inside the perimeter computed by WorldFires. human-settlement.emergency.copernicus.eu

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
10 Jan 34.5 °C 26 % 50 km/h 0.2 mm High 37
11 Jan 28.0 °C 32 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
12 Jan 30.6 °C 30 % 34 km/h 0.0 mm High 30
13 Jan 28.0 °C 37 % 53 km/h 0.0 mm High 34
14 Jan 26.0 °C 25 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
15 Jan 29.1 °C 26 % 41 km/h 0.0 mm High 32
16 Jan after 22.3 °C 38 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm High 29
17 Jan after 23.6 °C 30 % 47 km/h 0.0 mm High 31
18 Jan after 27.0 °C 27 % 49 km/h 0.0 mm High 33
19 Jan after 31.6 °C 21 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 41
20 Jan after 33.5 °C 21 % 50 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
21 Jan after 35.6 °C 16 % 46 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 48
22 Jan after 33.0 °C 24 % 38 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 44
23 Jan after 35.5 °C 21 % 39 km/h 0.0 mm Very high 45
24 Jan after 30.7 °C 37 % 48 km/h 0.0 mm High 37
25 Jan after 28.2 °C 26 % 43 km/h 0.0 mm High 34

Its twins: fires that started in the same weather

It started with an FWI of 37.3, a minimum humidity of 26% and 32 days without rain. Fires in the area that started in weather like this since 2016: 4.

FWI at the start 37.3
Minimum humidity 26 %
Days without rain 32
this fire chosen twins rest of the area
Almost identicalSimilar

Outlines of the closest twins

Donnybrook-Balingup fire, February 2019
5,417 ha 4 days FWI 35.6 Min. humidity 30 % 35 km away, in 2019

First rain (1 mm or more) after it ended: none in the following ten days.

What happened to them

Fires in the area that started in similar weather: 4. With fewer than 15 we give no figures: they would be more noise than signal.

This is a bank of analogues: it shows what usually happens, not what will happen. With fewer than 15 twins we give no figures. How we calculate it

How it ended

—first rain
—no rain in ten days
53km/h · max. gust

It was considered over on 15 Jan, and not even 1 mm fell in the following ten days: it went out without rain.

Weather on this page: Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

How a twin is chosen

  • Same area: fires that have already ended, less than 250 km from this one, since 2016.
  • Same start: we compare the FWI on the first day, the minimum humidity that day and the run of days without rain before it. The slider sets how much they may differ.
  • Only pages with final weather data (ERA5 reanalysis) calculated in the same way as this fire’s; agricultural and grass burns and pages with data under review are left out.
  • Fires burning at the same time as this one (a week before or after) are left out: they share the same spell of weather and do not count as a precedent.
  • They are sorted by similarity, and the outlines of the first five are drawn.

How we calculate it

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 3 Jan 2023
After · 22 Jan 2023

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

The smoke

CAMS · Copernicus

On 12 January 2023 the air beside the fire reached 48 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 17: 1.2 times the WHO daily guideline (15).

PM2.5 peak48 µg/m³
Days over the guideline1 day
PM1069 µg/m³
Optical depth0.73
8 Jan11 Jan14 Jan17 Jan
Good Fair Moderate Poor Very poor Extremely poor

Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)

Detections table · 437Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Australia

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Donnybrook-Balingup fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 10 January 2023 and 15 January 2023: 6 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 7,126 hectares (71.3 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire only entered Donnybrook-Balingup (7,134 ha, 4.6 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 34.5 °C, humidity dropped to 25 % and gusts hit 53 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 37, class High.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Australia (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 000 · Emergency number and official warnings

Satellite cross-check

History of this page Changes in area, dates, name, official record or merged pages, compared every night since 24 October 2026.

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 000.

How we know this
  • Perimeter: GWIS (Copernicus), rebuilt from heat detections rather than mapped on imagery.
  • Dates from the perimeter: the VIIRS detections inside it did not change them. 437 Suomi-NPP VIIRS detections on those dates.
  • We have not matched this page with any official record.
  • Weather: Copernicus ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, in cells of about 25 km.
  • Built-up area and population come from the JRC Global Human Settlement Layer (epoch 2025, 100 m cells), summed inside the perimeter: an estimate of what was there, not a damage count.

How we build fire pages: methodology

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.