Skip to content
worldfires
AR · Argentina · →

Curacó fire, 9 January 2018 Curacó, Lihuel Calel

Out · last detection 9 Jan 2018, 17:26 UTC

The fire started on 9 January 2018 in Curacó, Argentina, and satellites saw it burning for 1 day. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 5,090 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 53th largest in La Pampa since 2016 (of 190 with a page). Number 20 in Argentina in 2018, of 179.

Burnt area
5,090ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
1day
9 Jan 2018 – 9 Jan 2018
Municipalities hit
2
departments
Started on
9 Jan
2018
Heat detections
161
in a single hotspot: 175 MW
Danger at start
65
Extreme · FWI index
Energy released
6.1GW
sum of detected power

Where it burned

HOTSPOTS BY DAY 9 Jan9 Jan

How it evolved, day by day

9

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

39°high
55km/h · peak gust
22%lowest humidity

It had gone 26 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.1 mm on 15 Jan.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. Curacó where it started
    4,919 ha reached on 9 Jan
    0.4 %
  2. 164 ha reached on 9 Jan
    0.0 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
9 Jan 38.8 °C 22 % 55 km/h 1.1 mm Extreme 65
10 Jan after 37.6 °C 19 % 40 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 55
11 Jan after 38.2 °C 21 % 49 km/h 0.5 mm Very extreme 71
12 Jan after 39.3 °C 9 % 52 km/h 0.0 mm Very extreme 76
13 Jan after 28.4 °C 20 % 59 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 68
14 Jan after 30.6 °C 14 % 36 km/h 0.0 mm Extreme 54
15 Jan after 33.3 °C 18 % 57 km/h 1.1 mm Extreme 54

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 2 Jan 2018
After · 16 Jan 2018

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 161Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Argentina ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Curacó fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 9 January 2018 and 9 January 2018: 1 day between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 5,090 hectares (50.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Curacó (4,919 ha, 0.4 %); Lihuel Calel (164 ha, 0.0 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 38.8 °C, humidity dropped to 22 % and gusts hit 55 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 65, class Extreme.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Argentina (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 911 · 100

Satellite cross-check

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 911 · 100.

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.