Skip to content
worldfires
CL · Chile · →

Curacautín fire, March 2017 Curacautín, Lautaro

Out · last detection 17 Mar 2017, 18:54 UTC

The fire started on 15 March 2017 in Curacautín, Chile, and satellites saw it burning for 2 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,450 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.

It is the 91th largest in Región de La Araucanía since 2016 (of 159 with a page). Number 34 in Chile in 2017, of 56.

Burnt area
1,450ha
GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
Duration
2days
15 Mar 2017 – 16 Mar 2017
Municipalities hit
2
communes
Started on
15 Mar
2017
Heat detections
64
in a single hotspot: 84 MW
Danger at start
1
Very low · FWI index
Energy released
1.5GW
sum of detected power

Where it burned

17 Mar 2017
HOTSPOTS BY DAY 15 Mar16 Mar

How it evolved, day by day

151617

Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.

The weather it burned in

25°high
33km/h · peak gust
44%lowest humidity

It had gone 3 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 1.0 mm on 24 Mar.

This area had burned before

No earlier perimeters overlap this fire since 2016, when the satellite record begins.

What happened to each town

  1. Curacautín where it started
    1,081 ha reached on 15 Mar
    0.6 %
  2. 372 ha reached on 15 Mar
    0.4 %

Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.

The weather day by day

ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.

Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)

Day High Min. humidity Peak gust Rain Danger (FWI)
15 Mar 19.3 °C 66 % 33 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 1
16 Mar 25.3 °C 44 % 31 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
17 Mar after 24.7 °C 50 % 23 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
18 Mar after 20.9 °C 73 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 2
19 Mar after 20.0 °C 69 % 30 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 2
20 Mar after 21.4 °C 70 % 35 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
21 Mar after 24.8 °C 59 % 27 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 3
22 Mar after 26.1 °C 56 % 24 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 4
23 Mar after 23.1 °C 66 % 26 km/h 0.0 mm Very low 4
24 Mar after 18.6 °C 77 % 34 km/h 1.0 mm Very low 1

Before and after, from space

Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.

Before · 8 Mar 2017
After · 23 Mar 2017

If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.

Detections table · 64Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
⬇ Download CSV Times in UTC. Each detection is a 375 m pixel: a large fire yields hundreds per pass.
Date and timeSatelliteFRP (MW)LatLon

Other fires nearby

All fires in Chile ›

Frequently asked questions

How long did the Curacautín fire last?
GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 15 March 2017 and 16 March 2017: 2 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
How much area did it burn?
The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,450 hectares (14.5 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
Which municipalities burned?
The fire entered 2 municipalities: Curacautín (1,081 ha, 0.6 %); Lautaro (372 ha, 0.4 %).
What was the weather like?
During the fire the temperature reached 25.3 °C, humidity dropped to 44 % and gusts hit 33 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 3, class Very low.
Where does this data come from?
From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Chile (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.

Where to verify it

A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.

Emergency number: 130 (CONAF) · 132

Satellite cross-check

Does something look wrong on this page?

This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.

Report an error
What do you think is wrong?

We will only use your email to reply about this report. Privacy. This is not an emergency service: if there is a fire now, call 130 (CONAF) · 132.

Where this data comes from

The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM3 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.