Cuamba fire, 29 August 2026 Cuamba, Metarica, Mandimba
The fire started on 29 August 2026 in Cuamba, Mozambique, and satellites saw it burning for 27 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 61,192 hectares from heat detections, spread across 3 municipalities.
It is the largest fire in Niassa since 2016 (of 577 with a page). Number 16 in Mozambique in 2026, of 532.
- Burnt area
- 61,192ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 27days
- 29 Aug 2026 – 24 Sept 2026
- Municipalities hit
- 3
- districts
- Started on
- 29 Aug
- 2026
- Heat detections
- 3,022
- in a single hotspot: 127 MW
- Danger at start
- 24
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 23.2GW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone more than two months without rain (1 mm or more) when it started. Rain came after the fire: 2.4 mm on 29 Sept.
This area had burned before
64% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 1,042 ha in 2016, 510 ha in 2017, 750 ha in 2018, 931 ha in 2019, 1,264 ha in 2020, 2,768 ha in 2021, 4,904 ha in 2022, 5,599 ha in 2023, 7,374 ha in 2024, 28,717 ha in 2025. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 38,984 ha that had burned before.
- 6,245 ha Cuamba fire, September 2025 6,732 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 3,133 ha Metarica fire, September 2025 6,660 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,781 ha Mandimba fire, September 2025 3,031 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,399 ha Metarica fire, September 2024 4,905 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
- 1,203 ha Metarica fire, September 2025 3,082 ha in total; the hectares shown are those it shares with this fire
What happened to each town
-
Cuamba where it started36,624 ha reached on 22 Aug6.8 %
-
21,394 ha reached on 22 Aug4.4 %
-
3,481 ha reached on 24 Aug0.7 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug | 26.2 °C | 40 % | 33 km/h | 0.6 mm | High 24 |
| 30 Aug | 29.7 °C | 32 % | 31 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 29 |
| 31 Aug | 30.0 °C | 31 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 31 |
| 1 Sept | 29.8 °C | 29 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 2 Sept | 29.6 °C | 28 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 3 Sept | 29.8 °C | 27 % | 31 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 4 Sept | 30.8 °C | 31 % | 38 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 37 |
| 5 Sept | 29.6 °C | 37 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 6 Sept | 29.1 °C | 37 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 7 Sept | 29.6 °C | 30 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 35 |
| 8 Sept | 24.8 °C | 46 % | 44 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 33 |
| 9 Sept | 25.6 °C | 42 % | 38 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 32 |
| 10 Sept | 28.4 °C | 43 % | 33 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 27 |
| 11 Sept | 28.4 °C | 44 % | 26 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 25 |
| 12 Sept | 29.3 °C | 36 % | 26 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 28 |
| 13 Sept | 30.0 °C | 34 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 14 Sept | 29.9 °C | 29 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 15 Sept | 31.7 °C | 24 % | 36 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 16 Sept | 30.4 °C | 23 % | 34 km/h | 0.0 mm | Very high 39 |
| 17 Sept | 29.9 °C | 36 % | 32 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 34 |
| 18 Sept | 30.5 °C | 29 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 19 Sept | 29.5 °C | 30 % | 31 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 36 |
| 20 Sept | 29.0 °C | 41 % | 30 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 21 Sept | 29.5 °C | 44 % | 30 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 30 |
| 22 Sept | 27.9 °C | 47 % | 30 km/h | 8.2 mm | Low 5 |
| 23 Sept | 28.5 °C | 50 % | 26 km/h | 1.8 mm | Low 6 |
| 24 Sept | 30.1 °C | 36 % | 26 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 19 |
| 25 Sept after | 28.7 °C | 39 % | 18 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 26 Sept after | 28.7 °C | 44 % | 37 km/h | 0.4 mm | High 26 |
| 27 Sept after | 32.3 °C | 36 % | 35 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 28 Sept after | 33.0 °C | 38 % | 38 km/h | 0.3 mm | High 29 |
| 29 Sept after | 30.8 °C | 44 % | 35 km/h | 2.4 mm | Moderate 11 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 16 September 2026 the air beside the fire reached 61 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 35: 2.3 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 3,022Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Cuamba fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 29 August 2026 and 24 September 2026: 27 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 61,192 hectares (611.9 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 3 municipalities: Cuamba (36,624 ha, 6.8 %); Metarica (21,394 ha, 4.4 %); Mandimba (3,481 ha, 0.7 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 31.7 °C, humidity dropped to 23 % and gusts hit 44 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 39, class Very high.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Mozambique (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.