Chun fire, February 2023 Chun, Dok Khamtai
The fire started on 10 February 2023 in Chun, Thailand, and satellites saw it burning for 4 days. Copernicus’s global GWIS system rebuilt a burnt perimeter of 1,869 hectares from heat detections, spread across 2 municipalities.
It is the 45th largest in Phayao Province since 2016 (of 125 with a page). Number 170 in Thailand in 2023, of 500.
The power measured by the satellite is low (22.0 MW in the strongest hotspot), more typical of grass or stubble burning, or a slow surface fire, than of a large crown fire.
- Burnt area
- 1,869ha
- GWIS perimeter (Copernicus)
- Duration
- 4days
- 10 Feb 2023 – 13 Feb 2023
- Municipalities hit
- 2
- districts
- Started on
- 10 Feb
- 2023
- Heat detections
- 59
- in a single hotspot: 22 MW
- Danger at start
- 34
- High · FWI index
- Energy released
- 208MW
- sum of detected power
Where it burned
How it evolved, day by day
Fire radiative power detected each day, in megawatts, and number of hotspots. The magenta bar marks the peak day.
The weather it burned in
It had gone 28 days without rain (1 mm or more) when it started.
This area had burned before
91% of the perimeter overlaps earlier fires recorded since 2016: 331 ha in 2017, 1,083 ha in 2019, 1,423 ha in 2020, 532 ha in 2021. Part of it burned more than once, so the yearly figures add up to more than the 1,699 ha that had burned before.
What happened to each town
-
Chun where it started1,404 ha reached on 10 Feb2.6 %
-
475 ha reached on 11 Feb0.6 %
Burnt area inside each municipality, from crossing the GWIS perimeter with administrative boundaries. The distance is from the town centre to the nearest fire: staying a kilometre away does not mean it reached the houses.
The weather day by day
ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis at the fire location, the standard reference for past weather, and the Canadian Fire Weather Index (the same system Copernicus uses), computed by WorldFires from that data. Days after the fire run until the first rain.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Climate Change Service (ERA5)
| Day | High | Min. humidity | Peak gust | Rain | Danger (FWI) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 Feb | 33.5 °C | 18 % | 29 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 34 |
| 11 Feb | 33.4 °C | 20 % | 24 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 12 Feb | 33.5 °C | 24 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 13 Feb | 33.4 °C | 28 % | 19 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 33 |
| 14 Feb after | 33.2 °C | 20 % | 23 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 32 |
| 15 Feb after | 31.7 °C | 40 % | 37 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 29 |
| 16 Feb after | 30.1 °C | 43 % | 29 km/h | 0.2 mm | High 25 |
| 17 Feb after | 24.6 °C | 48 % | 31 km/h | 0.3 mm | Moderate 21 |
| 18 Feb after | 28.8 °C | 40 % | 20 km/h | 0.0 mm | Moderate 20 |
| 19 Feb after | 32.4 °C | 28 % | 17 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 26 |
| 20 Feb after | 31.0 °C | 36 % | 30 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 28 |
| 21 Feb after | 29.8 °C | 40 % | 32 km/h | 0.1 mm | High 28 |
| 22 Feb after | 32.3 °C | 33 % | 32 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
| 23 Feb after | 32.4 °C | 32 % | 33 km/h | 0.0 mm | High 28 |
Before and after, from space
Drag the line to compare the same ground before the fire and after it.
If the day is cloudy, change the date: each satellite passes once a day. In false colour the burnt ground looks brown or red.
The smoke
CAMS · CopernicusOn 14 February 2023 the air beside the fire reached 44 µg/m³ of PM2.5. That day averaged 36: 2.4 times the WHO daily guideline (15).
Particles from the Copernicus CAMS model at the centre of the perimeter; these are not measurements in each town. The pale bar is the worst hour, the solid one the daily average.
Open-Meteo.com (CC BY 4.0) · Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)
Detections table · 59Every satellite heat detection, one by one, with time, satellite, power and coordinates.
| Date and time | Satellite | FRP (MW) | Lat | Lon |
|---|
Other fires nearby
Frequently asked questions
- How long did the Chun fire last?
- GWIS (Copernicus) dates it between 10 February 2023 and 13 February 2023: 4 days between the first and last heat detection of the perimeter.
- How much area did it burn?
- The perimeter GWIS (Copernicus) rebuilt from heat detections is 1,869 hectares (18.7 km²). It is an estimate: official national figures may differ.
- Which municipalities burned?
- The fire entered 2 municipalities: Chun (1,404 ha, 2.6 %); Dok Khamtai (475 ha, 0.6 %).
- What was the weather like?
- During the fire the temperature reached 33.5 °C, humidity dropped to 18 % and gusts hit 29 km/h. The fire danger index (FWI) reached 34, class High.
- Where does this data come from?
- From the GWIS (Copernicus) burnt perimeter, NASA FIRMS VIIRS hotspots and the administrative boundaries of Thailand (geoBoundaries). It is not an official report.
Where to verify it
A satellite detection is not an official report. Final figures and the fire’s status are published by each country’s emergency service.
Emergency number: 199 · 191
Satellite cross-check
Does something look wrong on this page?
This page is built from satellite data and official records, and it sometimes gets things wrong: the wrong dates, the wrong town, two fires merged into one, or something that was not a wildfire at all. If you know this fire first-hand (you live nearby, saw it, fought it or reported on it), tell us what really happened and we will check it.
Report an error
Where this data comes from
The perimeter comes from the Copernicus Global Wildfire Information System (GWIS), which rebuilds it from MODIS and VIIRS heat detections and publishes it under CC BY 4.0. It is not measured on imagery as in Europe, so it is an estimate. Heat detections come from the VIIRS sensors aboard Suomi-NPP and NOAA-20, distributed by NASA FIRMS at 375 m resolution. Municipal boundaries come from geoBoundaries ADM2 (Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Intergovernmental Organisations (CC BY 3.0 IGO)). The area per municipality is computed by WorldFires by crossing the perimeter with those boundaries, so it may differ from each country’s official figure.